Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Sarah Palin Signs House Bill Expanding School Loans
Governor Palin 4 President ^

Posted on 07/01/2009 4:47:05 AM PDT by MaxCUA

Anchorage, Alaska - Governor Sarah Palin will ceremonially sign House Bill 172 in Anchorage Wednesday afternoon. HB 172, sponsored by the governor, allows the Department of Revenue to enter into a bond purchase agreement and letter of credit with the Alaska Student Loan Corp to finance student loans. Without this action, the state would have been unable to make student loans for the upcoming school year.


TOPICS: Education; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: credit; palin; studentloans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2009 4:47:05 AM PDT by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

Socialist-lite.


2 posted on 07/01/2009 5:01:35 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
Socialist-lite.

Why is a loan socialist?

3 posted on 07/01/2009 5:08:34 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

It’s a loan. Not a giveaway. Geeewizzzz.


4 posted on 07/01/2009 5:09:47 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

Bfltr


5 posted on 07/01/2009 5:21:26 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Because it is being done by the government with taxpayer money. In a free economy banks lend money. Taxpayers are not forced to do so. And “conservatives” can’t see this? That’s why we are in trouble. Republicans are just second-rate Dems.


6 posted on 07/01/2009 5:25:00 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: all the best
Banks don't lend money to smart poor people. Last time I checked, a high Sat score did not qualify one for a private loan.

Of all the money flowing out the door for really stupid stuff, you pick this one to jump on? This sounds more like another plea to help the high power crooks keep their stupid kids running the country rather than the brightest people.

No thanks.

7 posted on 07/01/2009 6:06:22 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

Keep them gov’t bennies flowing................


8 posted on 07/01/2009 6:10:56 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

I pick it all to jump on. I take a consistent, principled stand. You’re saying the needy/worthy (by your definition) should get help. Obama’s stand exactly.


9 posted on 07/01/2009 6:37:32 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: all the best
No...Obama wants a communist dictatorship. I want smart people to run the country. I don't have a problem with smart people.

I have a problem with the schools selling communism, not smart poor people getting a hand up and paying it back. I have a problem with giveaways to crooks and people who either don't want to work for a living and want something for nothing or think they are entitled to something because their parents were rich.

Smart people who go to school and earn a living in a capitalist country is a very good thing.

So what is your stand? Let the mega rich or the union Mafia bosses (one party or the other) get their dumb kids running everything?

Like I said, no thanks.

10 posted on 07/01/2009 6:47:56 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

I don’t want “smart people” to “run the country”. I am looking for freedom and I want people to run their own lives. The problem is smart people running the country. Hillary is a heck of a lot more intelligent that Sarah. Hands down. Hillary is also an evil fool. But an intelligent one.
We have had enough of smart people running the country. I am a man and I don’t want any politician running me or my family. If you are not man enough to run your own life and need government help, then you and I are in different boats. Nobody should be running the country. Don’t you get it? What are you some kind if fascist or socialist?
It’s about freedom and individual responsibility.


11 posted on 07/01/2009 7:00:56 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Reading through this, this is actually a bond purchase agreement, so in a since, the taxpayers are buying bonds, ie a return on the investment as the loans are paid back. Bond issuances are normal for States and municipalities and well within the 10th Amendment rights of the States. This isn’t just a taxpayer handout as some claim.


12 posted on 07/01/2009 7:04:13 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; all the best

See post #12.


13 posted on 07/01/2009 7:25:19 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: all the best
I think you've confused actual smart people with people who think they're smart. Hillary smarter than Sarah? What evidence do you have of this?
14 posted on 07/01/2009 7:28:19 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
Sarah Palin would have never gained admission to Yale Law School. And do not make me out to be a supporter of Hillary. I totally renounce her and all her works. There are some very smart(and totally twisted evil) Democrats. To think otherwise is totally delusional. The problem is that as people get smarter they tend to become proud and arrogant and think they know better than God and want to run the world and everybody's lives. Hence you will find a lot of very bright liberals.
15 posted on 07/01/2009 7:36:11 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

and so there is no mistake, I would much prefer Sarah Palin to Hillary Clinton.


16 posted on 07/01/2009 7:38:10 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: all the best
Sarah Palin would have never gained admission to Yale Law School.

Oh, now I get it. Getting admitted to Yale is what makes people smart. I thought IQ was a measure of intelligence. Corrected I stand.

17 posted on 07/01/2009 7:49:26 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; numberonepal

The taxpayers are buying bonds? So the government is taking money form the taxpayers and investing it for them? How thoughtful of the nannies. Just because this is permitted by the federal constitution does not make it right.
As a principles enemy if the nanny state I find this whole deal repugnant. We are in this mess because those who should know better (conservatives/Republicans) do not stand up to all these schemes. We need to set our standards a little higher. Time is running out.


18 posted on 07/01/2009 9:20:39 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: all the best

I see you don’t know how bonds work. The government isn’t buying bonds for the taxpayers, they are issuing bonds, which means they offer the bonds for sale.

Taxpayers and other investors choose if they want to buy them. These type of bonds are usually considered one of the safest investment vehicles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_bond


19 posted on 07/01/2009 9:30:03 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: all the best

..this is actually a far more Conservative approach than direct taxation because investors can choose to buy or not buy the bonds based on what they see as a return on investment. It is the exact opposite of a nanny-state approach because the State isn’t telling the citizens what they must spend their money on, instead, they are offering the bonds and the citizens can choose to buy them or not of their own free will.


20 posted on 07/01/2009 9:32:51 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson