Skip to comments.
Michelle Thinks She Was Elected Empress
Publius' Forum ^
| 6/29/09
| Warner Todd Huston
Posted on 06/29/2009 6:48:28 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Sometimes the server gets a tad overloaded. IF the link doesn't work, try back later.
To: Mobile Vulgus
Now who want’s their pants back?
2
posted on
06/29/2009 6:56:32 AM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(We the people, ..... never)
To: Mobile Vulgus
I predicted the angry entitled Michelle would explode from the pressure of having to be around white people (doting on her hsuband and her family) and having to be nice to everyone. Her anger glows through on her photos, when she is caught in an unguarded moment. Poor little girls with an angry mother living a fake image, and pooor her, to miss so much of life when it has given her so much.
Hillary was an angry woman, too. I think that is why Laura Bush was like the calm after a bad storm.
Popcorn, anyone.
3
posted on
06/29/2009 6:57:08 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
To: Mobile Vulgus
Since the first lady has no defined Constitutional role, is it Constitutional for the taxpayers of the U.S. to be forced to pay the salary of her “full time speech writer”?
4
posted on
06/29/2009 6:59:56 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16)
To: Mobile Vulgus
This article is full of it. The substance Michelle demands is booze.
5
posted on
06/29/2009 7:00:32 AM PDT
by
monocle
To: Mobile Vulgus
Is that the title given to the head rag lady of Kenya?
6
posted on
06/29/2009 7:01:04 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
7
posted on
06/29/2009 7:03:49 AM PDT
by
maggief
To: maggief
8
posted on
06/29/2009 7:06:43 AM PDT
by
mick
(Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
To: WayneS
Since the first lady has no defined Constitutional role, is it Constitutional for the taxpayers of the U.S. to be forced to pay the salary of her full time speech writer? I'd really like to see where in the Constitution the "first lady" gets to stuff a staff of 20 with her old cronies that kissed her ass since her affirmative action college 'daze.' A STAFF OF 20 FOR A "MOM"?!!!
9
posted on
06/29/2009 7:07:58 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: Mobile Vulgus
10
posted on
06/29/2009 7:08:56 AM PDT
by
VR-21
(The election of Barack Obama was a hate crime.)
To: maggief
They don’t look like they are having/just had a very good time, do they?
11
posted on
06/29/2009 7:09:26 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16)
To: WayneS
We have governor clueless Jenny here in Michigan. Michigan, as you may know as a very high unemployment rate, high taxes, and lots of government. Clueless’ husband Daniel has a staff of at least three and probably receives a salary as well as “First Gentleman.” Clueless is a key Maobama supporter so may have coached the Maobamas on staffing for the “Empress” Michelle Insane Obama.
12
posted on
06/29/2009 7:17:29 AM PDT
by
RushLake
(Democrats & Maobama have never met a terrorist they didn't like.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
This article is over the top. Criticising the first lady for having her staff attend daily "messaging meetings" with Robert Gibbs and Rahm Emanual's daily staff meetings seems gratuitous to me. Wouldnt a first lady's staff need to know about key messages and schedules and stuff so she could coordinate her own schedule and comments? Seems reasonable to me.
As for the power stuff, being at the "fulcrum" of power is not the same as being the power. It means being influential. Does anyone think any first lady isnt influential? Nancy Reagan sure was, Hillary Clinton sure was, I'm sure in her own way Laura Bush was though certainly more subtly I'd wager.
I'm no fan of Michelle Obama but maybe we should wait until she inevitably says something outrageous before we slam her. So far she's hid it well. But it will come out, her inner anger is still there.
13
posted on
06/29/2009 7:24:59 AM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Who is John Galt?)
To: silverleaf
Not only that, but she has a drinking problem.

Quickpost this image to Myspace, Digg, Facebook, and others!
14
posted on
06/29/2009 7:31:18 AM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: pepsi_junkie
...maybe we should wait until she inevitably says something outrageous before we slam her
I guess you forgot this:
"For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country"
15
posted on
06/29/2009 7:38:50 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
She got the "ress" part right! A first lady should support her man. Therefore, given her attributes the proper term would be
BUTTress!
16
posted on
06/29/2009 8:03:50 AM PDT
by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
To: pepsi_junkie
the point is however,what the hell does she need a staff for? maybe one person to perform secretarial duties but what else? who elected her?
i use any and all feminine apellations loosely when speaking of her since she is far more masculine than her husband.
17
posted on
06/29/2009 8:10:16 AM PDT
by
wiggen
To: pepsi_junkie
the point is however,what the hell does she need a staff for? maybe one person to perform secretarial duties but what else? who elected her?
i use any and all feminine apellations loosely when speaking of her since she is far more masculine than her husband.
18
posted on
06/29/2009 8:11:32 AM PDT
by
wiggen
To: Mobile Vulgus
""A First Lady Who Demands Substance."Then why does she dress like a clown?
19
posted on
06/29/2009 8:17:01 AM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
To: brytlea; Diana in Wisconsin; Kakaze; Tammy8; unkus; metmom; Cap Huff; svcw; leapfrog0202; ...
20
posted on
06/29/2009 8:44:31 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(If Tehran offered an unclenched fist, Obama would be shaking a bloody hand and calling it good.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson