Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The NY Times explains the impossibility of states cutting their budgets … ever!
The Virginian ^ | 6/22/2009 | Moneyrunner

Posted on 06/22/2009 2:00:46 PM PDT by moneyrunner

“Reason” illustrates the way the MSM – and my local paper, the Virginian Pilot – treats the subject of budget shortfalls on the part of state and local governments. I don’t attribute it to the fact that the spouses of people in the news business typically work for the government, which would be crass. No, I attribute it to the bias in the MSM to government as the answer … to any question.

Workaday Media Bias and State Budget Crises, Example #1 shows the typical manner in which pretty much any newspaper views government spending.

The only bit in the entire 1,283-word article that even references the widespread and routine state spending increases before the crisis hit is this brief attributed paragraph, presented as if the natural order of things is government growth above and beyond that of inflation and population:

While state general fund spending typically increases by about 6 percent a year, it is expected to decline by 2.2 percent for this fiscal year, Mr. Pattison said. The last year-to-year decline was in 1983, he said, on the heels of a national banking crisis.

How is this viewed?

"These are some of the worst numbers we have ever seen," said Scott D. Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers[.] And have the poor state governments have been starved all these many years so that now that revenue is down because people have been thrown out of work they are on starvation budgets? Well ....

(Excerpt) Read more at moneyrunner.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: nmytimes; taxes; virginianpilot

1 posted on 06/22/2009 2:00:47 PM PDT by moneyrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

And have the poor state governments have been starved all these many years

My Ass! California has added 50,000 government jobs in the last 5 years.


2 posted on 06/22/2009 2:03:53 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Indeed. When California signed their budget deal last year, I defended the Republicans that went with it because I thought they were doing what they needed to do to save the state. Then I found out that 90% of California agencies had ADDED staff the same year. I felt like the chump of the century.


3 posted on 06/22/2009 2:16:13 PM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

When there is no more money you budget.


4 posted on 06/22/2009 2:20:31 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

they are buying into the Paul Krugman line that only gubbermint employees buying new pencils and underwear at WalMart are keeping the economy afloat


5 posted on 06/22/2009 3:12:05 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson