[DennisR]

Uh...no.

[exDemMom]

while other aspects of Darwin’s theories have been disproved or called into serious question (macroevolution, single tree of life)

Actually, scientists have not disproved these or called them into question. Nor do scientists make a distinction between "microevolution" and "macroevolution."

Since your article is basically a religious article, please don't state your thesis as if it is scientific knowledge that is generally accepted by the scientific community.

[Chode]

iirc i read someplace that they took all the natural ingredients of the primordial soup and hit it with artificial lightning under different temperatures and pressures and it we to no avail...

[Caipirabob]

ABSOLUTELY...if God permits...

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

INNER LIFE OF THE CELL

[presently no screen name]

all living things are related

because all living things have the same Creator.

[Batrachian]

I think that this argument can be boiled down to the following two statements:

1) "Evolution must be false and Genesis must be true".

2) "Genesis must be false and Evolution must be true".

We should take a poll.

[Vaduz]

When DNA was discovered, science assumed that soon everything would become clear. Just the opposite has happened, and science doesn’t like tha,.Sounds right.