Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: blackrobe

I consider my oath to be binding as well. I didn’t take it lightly.


15 posted on 06/10/2009 3:20:32 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SWAMPSNIPER

>I consider my oath to be binding as well. I didn’t take it lightly.

I as well.
Though there are several cases which could be treason, the aid and adherence to America’s enemies, that Obama is directly accountable for:
1 - The full pardoning of the USS Cole bomber.
2 - The dropping of charges of the 11Sep01 terrorists.
3 - The signing into law of a document he did not read (the stimulus bill).
4 - The coercion of the auto execs.

And indirectly:
1 - The dropping of the charges against the two New Black Panther members who were practicing voter-intimidation.
2 - The [specific] closing of auto-dealerships, which MAY be targeted due to their political involvements/
3 - Any ‘bailout’ of California which comes at the expense of ANY other state that he signs.


22 posted on 06/10/2009 3:39:14 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Oh, and the USSC could be considered traitors for:

1 - Refusing to see/try the cases against Obama regarding his natural born status.
2 - Refusing to hear the case[s] of the GM/Chrysler bondholders, who are being cheated out of their contractual earnings/assets by sanction of the executive branch.
3 - The 25Jun05 decision (I believe Keely v. New England), wherein they validated governmental theft/larceny under guise of “Immanent Domain”.


25 posted on 06/10/2009 3:48:55 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

The Congress, generally speaking could be tried for treason for:
1 - The mere suggestion that the AIG bonuses be retroactively taxed at 90%... this is contra-Constitutional in at LEAST four ways.
2 - The refusal to properly investigate Obama’s eligibility before validating the electoral college votes.
3 - The passing of a bill which they, self-admittedly, did not read. (The stimulus package.)

More individually, Murtha:
1 - The condemnation of active-duty Marines in a war-zone before a investigation had even finished.
2 - The judges who ruled that the law protecting federal employees performing their duties applied to him.
3 - Any other such entity who aids and adheres to Murtha.


27 posted on 06/10/2009 3:52:10 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson