Posted on 06/02/2009 7:03:12 AM PDT by STARWISE
On May 28, Jeffrey Taylor resigned as acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia. I have not heard from one person who got a response from him regarding their quo warranto letters.
I did hear from one person who had proof that their QW letter to Taylor had been rerouted to the White House.
There is much speculation as to why Taylor resigned. I think its interesting to note that while he didnt file a quo warranto regarding Obamas eligibility, he also never told anyone who wrote to him that Obama was actually eligible and that Obama had been properly vetted which was the canned response from all of Congress.
Taylor never made such a statement.
It will be interesting to see now whether his successor in the DC US Attorneys office Channing Phillips will issue a statement saying Obama is eligible.
Was Taylor pressured to resign because he wouldnt vouch for Obama? I dont know. But I do know Taylor didnt have the support of enough US citizens.
So America gets what America deserves the destruction of its Constitution because the great majority of US citizens dont care about their Constitution.
My suggestion to anybody who does care is to send your quo warranto letters to US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.
Perhaps since the DC Code statute is vague in its wording only requiring the US Attorney to file for the quo warranto it could be used by any US Attorney.
That is not my original interpretation, but after seeing this fiasco play out, and listening to the lame excuses favoring Obamas eligibility, I dont see why any US Attorney couldnt use the statute. The statute just says the US Attorney.
I think Patrick Fitzgerald is your best bet now. At least youll probably get a response from his office.
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
* A Change of Plans
* QUOA WARRANTO: A New Hope Military can now retreat in peace. * QUO WARRANTO LEGAL BRIEF: Part 3 STANDING-TRIAL BY JURY- HISTORY OF STATUTE
* URGENT CALL TO ACTION
But ... what does a “quo warranto letter” look like? I must have missed a day of school :-)
So America gets what America deserves the destruction of its Constitution because the great majority of US citizens dont care about their Constitution.
***Almost tagline worthy — and Donofrio is the one who gave me my current tagline.
~~PING!
Hope many more Freepers can come to DC to join us! It is going to be a NOT TO MISS event! You can STILL let Freeper Brytani know that you plan to book a room at the chosen freeper hotel. Information on the hotel and how to book the room will come out soon on these threads below! Or, if you plan to book your own hotel, Brytani would just need to know you plan to attend the Freeper Convention Events/Banquet. Hoping to meet you in DC!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2258633/posts?page=272#272
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2261796/posts?page=44#44
Leo is right. We get what we deserve if we don't do more than just complain! We must actually write, call, and most important, talk and talk to friends and family about being active and doing your own research to seek the truth and find out what is going on!
Wish I could attend .......kudos and THANK YOU for all you’re doing !
Ok, it is tagline worthy.
New Tagline:
So America gets what America deserves the destruction of its Constitution because the great majority of US citizens dont care about their Constitution.
Old Tagline:
It’s all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08
getting rid of the weird squiggle
Thanks for the FReepmail. That looks pretty simple. I’ll have to discern for myself what “Quo Warranto” is before requesting it. But the letter is certainly short and sweet. Thanks again.
Perfect! Thanks for the link. Reading it now.
Maybe because he was a hold-over from the Bush administration and didn't want to work for Obama?
Ditto..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.