To: rintense
Regardless of my strong objection to Dr. Tiller's abortion practices, violence is never an answer in advancing the pro-life message."
The murderer is no better than Tiller.
13 posted on
06/01/2009 8:46:07 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: cripplecreek
Actually, I’d have to disagree with you on this one!
First of all, the murderer is probably a nut. But aside from that, he killed one person in what could be considered a crime of passion (he was angered by Tiller’s actions) while Tiller calmly and coolly killed thousands of completely defenseless people - for money.
Everybody is busy praying for Tiller, which certainly doesn’t hurt, but I’m praying for his killer, who needs prayers now to see that what he has done is wrong - because unlike Tiller, Roederer probably wasn’t a cold-blooded habitual killer.
27 posted on
06/01/2009 8:53:17 AM PDT by
livius
To: cripplecreek
I don’t agree with you. The murderer is guilty but he was - in his own way - defending the babies.
Tiller was murdering for money.
I think motive makes a huge difference.
35 posted on
06/01/2009 8:56:05 AM PDT by
Aria
( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
To: cripplecreek
The murderer is no better than Tiller.
Tiller operated under cover of "law," so he managed to be a lot more efficient in his killing.
38 posted on
06/01/2009 8:56:47 AM PDT by
farmer18th
(If you preach "too big to let fail," you're also preaching "too small to let succeed.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson