Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Change is comin........
1 posted on 05/29/2009 9:59:06 PM PDT by Danae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Danae

I expect them to create a situation when they are ready.


2 posted on 05/29/2009 10:03:33 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Sure they will try this.

They will sacrifice human life for their own gain.

Many will fall for the ruse.

Many of us will see through it.

They will be opposed!

They are evil bastards.


3 posted on 05/29/2009 10:05:53 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

what happens when the incident they are waiting for turns out to be a domestic terrorist attack where the terrorists end up getting their arses blown off by gun wielding citizens?


5 posted on 05/29/2009 10:08:19 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
They are waiting until there is some national level tragedy, the loss of life involving firearms, to introduce and then pass legislation banning guns.

This logic has always escaped me. What on earth does a microscopic percentage of people committing an extraordinarily rare crime have anything whatever to do with the criminalization and seizure of the guns of sixty million law abiding citizens? The very scale of this fraud is utterly insane.

6 posted on 05/29/2009 10:09:00 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

That’s how the Nazis gained power so fast. They used political skill and the media they controlled to take advantage of each and every national crisis and tragedy.


7 posted on 05/29/2009 10:09:50 PM PDT by jerry557
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

I doubt if they’re “waiting”. If you have absolutely no morals, why leave it to chance if you can produce your own tragedy tailor made for your evil purposes?


8 posted on 05/29/2009 10:10:18 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

Life imitating art?


14 posted on 05/29/2009 10:15:55 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

We need to invoke secession before the country falls into social collapse


15 posted on 05/29/2009 10:15:57 PM PDT by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

> “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them… Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in’, I would have done it.”

LOL - You might get the votes, but who would enforce it? How many Federal Officers would turn in their badges rather than get shot doing something illegal and, honestly, stupid? And who would keep the armed forces, who are sworn to uphold the Constitution, from engaging the traitors, who just voted so blatantly against it, in [violent] military action?


16 posted on 05/29/2009 10:16:54 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Like Create a crisis so they can do things that wouldn’t normally be accomplished?

Of course they are waiting. But why enact legislation when the prez can just declare martial law and accomplish a roundup without congressional authorization?


17 posted on 05/29/2009 10:17:06 PM PDT by o_zarkman44 (Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

My prediction:

By this time next year it will be much more difficult for the average citizen to obtain a gun—if they are not banned outright for all but police and government—inactive military will be banned as well.

Remember, the “it [US Constitution] doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf”.

These are not your run-of-the-mill liberals. These are communists.

This is but the quiet before the storm.

They WILL NOT wait for the people to vote away their power in 2010—it ain’t happening that way, folks.


19 posted on 05/29/2009 10:18:33 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
They are stuck in a Clinton-era time warp.

The difference this time is that millions more citizens own semi-auto rifles and millions more citizens have concealed carry permits now as compared to, say, 1994. Even amongst the Out Door Life crowd in the early 1990’s it was only the nut cases who had AR-15’s, whereas now they are seen as bona fide varmint rifles that have gone main stream (heck, even Remington makes one now). Throw in the Heller decision, and things get interested.

There are also democratic legislators who saw a good number of their comrades booted out of office in 1994 too, and would rather not play that game anymore.

If Obamzo the clown reads “these guns belong on foreign battle fields” off his teleprompter one more time, someone ought to ask if his secret service detail is on a foreign battle field. If disarmament is such a dandy thing then why should the federal government pester private individuals when the federal government could disarm itself with the stroke of a pen?

20 posted on 05/29/2009 10:24:05 PM PDT by Jacob Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

I can promise that when they try, there will be many more dead.


26 posted on 05/29/2009 10:51:13 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Well, whaddya know? Wayne LaPierre was correct twice.

“I’ve come to believe he (Clinton) needs a certain level of violence in this country. He is willing to accept a certain level of killing to further his political agenda. The vice president, too. How else can you explain this dishonesty we get out of the administration?”

Just switch the name..


38 posted on 05/29/2009 11:13:09 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
They must take our guns before they can take lives.

It will happen in 2013 if Obama gets re-elected.

82 posted on 05/30/2009 1:45:46 AM PDT by MaxMax (America's population is 304-Million. Obama must punish America for the other 4.7 Billion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Elected officials (I refuse to call them leaders) are sworn to uphold the Constitution.

It is time to require all elected officials with Constitutional duties to so fear violating that oath that they refuse to do so.

Any legislative or policy position that encroaches on any of the Bill of Rights or seeks to place limitations on US citizens must be considered un-American, Anti-Constitutional, and thus, treason.

In other words, messing with the Bill of Rights is a violation of the oath of office and capital treason.

Nationally treat like such and lets see what happens.


89 posted on 05/30/2009 3:13:26 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Defending RINOs is the same as defending Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

I wonder if those who thought 9/11 was an inside job would feel the same about any such incident that led to the banning of firearms.


92 posted on 05/30/2009 4:22:10 AM PDT by RWB Patriot ("Let 'em learn the hard way, 'cause teaching them is more trouble than they're worth,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Of course they are! Its their only means of abolishing the second amendment.


99 posted on 05/30/2009 5:57:06 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Very few NRA members subscribe to the magazine, “American’s First Freedom”. My son gets the magazine and it clearly shows the NRA in fights the other magazines or the leftist media don’t show.

Gun range protection.
Employee CCW in cars protection.
Hunter’s rights.
CCW laws on the state and local.
Five lawsuits because of Heller.
Katrina victim lawsuits.
Eddie Eagle and the lawsuits to keep it in schools.
National park CCW law.
The NRA has a average of sixty cases a year in legal assistance for members.

And lazy nonmembers will still ask what the NRA has done lately.


101 posted on 05/30/2009 6:17:21 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Four million NRA members out of 76 million gunowners.

Gunowners are too busy watching “American Idol” and when they do wake up it will be too late and they will ask “How come the NRA didn’t do anything”. And the NRA will ask how come you didn’t join when it could have been easy.


102 posted on 05/30/2009 6:23:16 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson