That is the potentially evil genius of this technology at work. 53% of the voters went for Obama. All of them are not ignorant. They heard what they needed to hear, because they told Obama's team exactly what that was. It is personal marketing ... narrowcasting as opposed to broadcasting.
What they heard didn't have to make sense. And, it never will.
Kenny wrote: That is the potentially evil genius of this technology at work. 53% of the voters went for Obama. All of them are not ignorant. They heard what they needed to hear, because they told Obama’s team exactly what that was. It is personal marketing ... narrowcasting as opposed to broadcasting.
And in support of “narrow-casting” is the fact that only 32% of the elgible voting citizens of the USA voted for Obama.
And if that 32% just wants to hear the right sound-bite or buzz-word, or even the absense of negative phrases, then ya got em.