Kenny wrote: That is the potentially evil genius of this technology at work. 53% of the voters went for Obama. All of them are not ignorant. They heard what they needed to hear, because they told Obama’s team exactly what that was. It is personal marketing ... narrowcasting as opposed to broadcasting.
And in support of “narrow-casting” is the fact that only 32% of the elgible voting citizens of the USA voted for Obama.
And if that 32% just wants to hear the right sound-bite or buzz-word, or even the absense of negative phrases, then ya got em.
This is an interesting strategy to look at from the perspective of how Obama is pissing off the left, too.
His mouth moves and says all the key words, then he does whatever the heck he chooses.
After a while the dating ends and character, behavior and true personality becomes really important and very apparent.
Who can deny that there is a strong homo-erotic undertone to the Left's incredible fascination with this Obama? It's not just Chris Mathew's "wet leg," or whatever, it's the way they just gush and simper about the guy. Disgusting. I loved Eisenhower, but not in that way!
BTW, low turnouts always favor the Dems. Not only is fraud easier to manage and easier to conceal, but it is even easier to turn out the base and make their votes really count.
And if that doesn't work .... count'em again.