Posted on 05/12/2009 5:56:51 AM PDT by careyb
O'Reilly discusses with the culture warriors.
Is it just me,or is Margaret Hoover REALLY annoying?
What's wrong with Harems, for that matter? (not that I would want one, mind you. one wife is all I can handle)
A cowboy wanted to marry his horse but Boulder County clerk would not issue a license. He has a much greater chance now!
Not triads, but it’s polyamory that’s sneaking up on society.
What’s next?Adult-child “marriage”?.(We already have the pedophile protection act).And don’t say it can’t happen because a minor can’t give their consent.(The left defends a minor’s “right” to consent to an abortion....without mom and dad ever knowing about it!).All it requires is a few more justices on the Supreme Court like Ginsberg,who once argued that the age of consent should be lowered to TWELVE!(AND that there was a constitutional right to polygamy and prostitution).
http://www.grasstopsusa.com/110605.html
I used to work with an American guy whose wife was from Kenya. His Father in law was considered well to do, and had several wives in separate homes.
He had met several of his “Mothers in law”, and his impression was that his Father in law was exponentially hen-pecked.
I look for human/animal marriages next. Like that woman whose chimp ripped off that womans face. She fed him steak and wine dinners and let the beast sleep in the bed with her. Weird!
Here in Texas the penalty for bigamy is ...
... drum roll, please ...
...
...
...
...
...
two wives
Cheer up, for the worst is yet to come!!
You forgot to mention their baths together...for some reason, I found that especially disturbing.
She is really annoying.
proving yet again that a 22 yr. old bathing beauty from California has more intelligence and common sense than the entire assembled braintrust of the Harvard Law School.
I have always believed that, if we have homosexual marriage, that this won’t be the last time we change the definition of marriage. Gay activists have wanted to go to group marriage, with any number and any gender of partners. They just haven’t told us that yet, but it’s coming. If we institutionalize homosexual marriage, then the next target will be the concept of monogamy.
And good liberals will swallow polygamy/polyamory.
Has anyone ever noticed how many good liberals say they favor same-sex marriage, because it’s “discriminatory” not to have it? How many people say they favor same-sex marriage because they think it’s good for society or good social policy? I hardly ever hear discussion of whether it’s good social policy or not, you only hear that a discriminatory society has denied these rights to homosexuals. And apparently we’re supposed to have a knee jerk reaction if anybody says the magic word “Discrimination” and immediately change all laws and social norms just to make Lambda Legal happy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.