[A Navy Vet]

"The computer you compose the message on can be listened to, unless you work inside a Faraday cage, or use a Tempest type system (hardened, so as not to release EMF)."

Thanks, I'll have to look into that, but it sounds very expensive.

"The best communication is no communication. Think: leaderless single-cell resistance."

I'm not thinking "leaderless single-cell resistance". I'm thinking basic comms between like-minded individuals who want to talk about the Fedgov without being interpreted as a "terrorist", according to the recent DHS memo and the obami triad.

We just want to talk without being heard...no matter who is talking. If one of the talkers turn out to be a McVeigh, we would turn them in immediately. In fact, the people I'm talking about would probably go to his house and drag his terrorist ass out and beat the holy crap out of him! Then we would use our secure comms to protect each other legally after turning him into pulp.

If the WE were to devise a political plan to re-instate our Constitution in a peaceful manner (although I'm not adverse to civil disobedience), then we need to have private comms, so the Marxists now in our Fedgov wouldn't have the advance warning. Get my drift?

[Sylvester McMonkey McBean]

I think we can all agree it’s important that the good guys be able to talk amongst ourselves without fear of scrutiny or compromise. Really, it’s a valid idea, but game it out the next step...let’s say a suitable mode of communication exists. How and to whom do you distribute it in a way that guarantees that only the good guys get it?