“ We are aware of the threats and are not able at this time to discuss any investigation by federal and local authorities. We can say that the Topix forum hosting corporate office is aware of the situation of their service being used to further terroristic threats.”Good grief. And we’re the ones they’re worried about.
Whew!! Good thing its not a threat from those crazy RW extremists; Homeland Security has been warning us about.
a bunch of real brave PUNKS, would love to sit, ( I know, I can be a tree sitter )and wait on them to show
Freedom Fighters.
If they were tea party attendees they would be right wing terrorists. /s
Eureka PING!
Yo Janet, got some more bombers for you to take a look at.
But blowing up a statue of GW is OK, because we didn't like him.
This logic escapes me.
When BO gets a statue erected in Ithaca, Austin, Burlington, wherever I doubt he’ll strike the same powerful pose as W.
He’ll be wiping his skinny arse with the Constitution in his and all will be well.
I just can not wrap my pea brain around such craziness. Is there no end to what the far left will stoop to when something happens they do not happen to like?
Rally around abortion clinics . . . kill babies cause it is our right but blow up a statue of Bush cause he is evil. Good Lord what on earth is happening to this society???
Words have meaning. You cannot terrorize a statute. You can threaten it, you can vandalize it, you can blow it up, you can pull it down, you can expose it to bird poop. But it is not a conscious being, and cannot be terrorized.
Word to idiot liberals, George W Bush doesn’t have the power anymore to do anything. None ,nilch, nada.
I don’t think we should have statues, schools named after, ships named after, etc of living current or former leaders at all (Presidents, Congressmen, whatever), but sure as hell don’t make terrorist threats about having them.
What are they threatening to do? Pull it down and then whack it in the head with their shoes?
Read the comments. Egads, the DUmmies are showing their true colors. However, the DUmmies posting there are the base of the Democratic Party, so these are not terroristic threats, they are just a unique way of political free speech. At least that is how one City Councildork from St. Paul, MN would describe it - yes, the same one who defended the actions of the RNC “anarchists” with Molotov cocktails and urine bombs. Now those disagreeing with the Obama administration in a civil manner - those are the real terrorists. Janet Napolitano said so.
I don’t think the George Bush statue is SKEERD of these
leftist threats. Hahahahah!
Funny thing is that the democrats in office were the ones who started this calling Bush a war criminal. After reading the thread that is what the idiot who makes the threats keeps going back to. (lets conveniently forget that the democrats also sanctioned the war though)
Liberals can be as violent as they want. When we get involved with anything like half a million people all over the country in peaceful protest and not one report of violence at all we are called terrorists.