No mas.
Interesting opinion. The judge ruled (1) the right to petition for redress of grievances is an important right; (2) The suit alleges a grievance which may well have legal merit [that the president of the United States is constitutionally prohibited from serving]; and (3) the lawyer who brought the suit should be reprimanded for having filed the suit [lack of legal standing].
Judge Robertson? Judge Roberts?
The bottom line is that Hemenway blistered Robertson with criticism, and demanded the right of discovery ( of Obama’s BC ), and Robertson meekly backed down. His bluff was called and he folded.
“Standing” in a case involving national office is possessed by all citizens having attained the age of majority.
For more “fun reading”, I refer you to the online publication that has been promoting this matter:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214