Interesting opinion. The judge ruled (1) the right to petition for redress of grievances is an important right; (2) The suit alleges a grievance which may well have legal merit [that the president of the United States is constitutionally prohibited from serving]; and (3) the lawyer who brought the suit should be reprimanded for having filed the suit [lack of legal standing].
Lyin’ SOB activist judges...
ANY US voter should have standing to bring this suit. And, if any cause is actionable, it should be a fundamental Constitutional question, as this one most assuredly is.
I’m not buyin’ it...
It’s time to take back the country.