Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palinphobes and the audacity of type
DC Examiner ^ | 3/17/09 | Noemie Emery

Posted on 03/18/2009 12:04:37 PM PDT by SolidWood

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Sherman Logan
You are right that the American REPUBLIC (different from pure Democracy, and superior to it) was more inclusive than contemporary political systems. But it had it's roots in British and ancient Roman system.

And originally it was also restricted to property (and often slave) holding white men.

21 posted on 03/18/2009 12:54:23 PM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

In the generally accepted use of the term today, America is most certainly a democracy. I’m going by dictionary definition, not definitions based on political philosophy or political history of ancient republics.

Here’s a couple of dictionary definitions:
* the political orientation of those who favor government by the people or by their elected representatives.
* a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them.

I’m assuming we both agree these definitions describe, at least in theory, the American system.

The primary meaning of a word is determined by the way most people use that word. If they misuse it long enough, the meaning changes.


22 posted on 03/18/2009 12:55:38 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

So Greece has been a democratic republic for 2500 years?

This would have been quite a shock to the Diadochi, Romans, Byzantines, Slavs, Crusaders, Venetians, Ottomans and others who ruled the area for 95% of this time.


23 posted on 03/18/2009 12:58:52 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Representative gov’ts only last as long as it takes for the voters to figure out how to vote themselves largesse from the treasury,
and as long as it takes for those being elected to figure out how to get around any prohibition of them doing so.


24 posted on 03/18/2009 1:00:47 PM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

By the 1830s America had pretty nearly universal white male suffrage. That’s precisely why Tocqueville spent months traveling this country and then wrote a major bestseller about it (Democracy in America).

He saw democracy as the wave of the future, even in Europe and not without qualms, and was fascinated by what it was like under such a system. Note he didn’t go to Britain, which was still heavily dominated by aristocrats, to find out what life in a democracy was like.


25 posted on 03/18/2009 1:02:17 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MrB

That theory is based on the somewhat exploded idea that society always consists of a pyramid, with a massive exploited underclass, a smaller middle class and a tiny elite. In such a case pure democracy is indeed likely to result in the underclass outvoting their betters and deciding to share the wealth, in the process of course destroying the very economy they’re trying to loot.

I’m not sure it applies equally well in a society shaped like a diamond. The massive numbers in this country are in the middle, neither at the top nor the bottom. There aren’t enough destitute voters to vote to destroy the system.

Anyway, that’s my story, and I’m sticking to it. Gotta be optimistic, ya know.


26 posted on 03/18/2009 1:06:48 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

We have a Teleprompter in Chief that is attempting to squeeze your “diamond” into a “pyramid”, then destroy the capitalist system while looting it.


27 posted on 03/18/2009 1:08:31 PM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“If they misuse it long enough, the meaning changes.”

Then it is way past time to STOP MISUSING IT!

It is important that this does get corrected. This country was founded as a Republic and we are paying the price now for turning it into a Democracy.


28 posted on 03/18/2009 1:08:35 PM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel (And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MrB

you mean the TOTUS?? (teleprompter of the United States)


29 posted on 03/18/2009 1:13:26 PM PDT by MountainWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MountainWoman

Yeah, I’ve seen that moniker.
But it might be a little too obscure for most libs to get -

they’ll understand the mockery of “Teleprompter in Chief”.


30 posted on 03/18/2009 1:15:14 PM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

*MEGA-SIGH*

If only.........


31 posted on 03/18/2009 1:29:58 PM PDT by luvie (The new Boston Tea Party is here, baby, and it's doused in barbecue sauce..Michelle Malkin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The Dutch Republic
32 posted on 03/18/2009 2:13:32 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

That is precisely why Conservatives should not refer to our country’s political system as a democracy.

Continuing to call it what it really is is the only acceptable way to describe our Constitutional Republic.


33 posted on 03/18/2009 2:17:59 PM PDT by Syncro (I'd rather regret something I did instead of regretting not doing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
Thanks for the ping, Wood.
As Obama's veneer fades away, exposing him for the mountebank that he is, Sarah Palin, the real Sarah Palin, will concomitantly be 'discovered' by many Americans.
It's all very simple, Obama and all he represents, is bad. Sarah Palin, with her belief, value system, and intelligence, is good. The latter wins over, eventually, every time.


Donate to SarahPAC

Donate to SarahPAC


34 posted on 03/18/2009 3:06:47 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“So Greece has been a democratic republic for 2500 years?”

No, but they had the oldest democracy. They were first.


35 posted on 03/18/2009 4:04:56 PM PDT by ari-freedom ( Hail to the Dork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

The Dutch Republic was no democracy. Even more than the UK at the time, it was an aristocratic oligarchy. Somewhat more representative than the absolute monarchies ruling most of Europe at the time, but not a democracy.


36 posted on 03/19/2009 5:04:21 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I hate to beat a dead horse, but it seems pretty clear to me that Hilary was speaking about which continent had more continuous history with democracy at this point in time.

I’ll let the argument over whether Athens was really a democracy slide, although no American today would consider them to qualify, with probably well under 25% of the adults allowed to vote. But ancient history has little to do with whether America or Europe has more continuous history with democracy at this point in time.

Greece, for instance, was a military dictatorship as recently as 1974.


37 posted on 03/19/2009 5:08:09 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
But it had it's roots in British and ancient Roman system.

Not completely. The American colonies also looked in their own back yard. IIRC, John Locke also travelled up to Canandaigua, New York and discussed the Iroquois Nations form of Republic, which only women could hold office.

38 posted on 03/20/2009 4:20:04 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson