Skip to comments.
USS Impeccable Harassed by Five Chinese Ships in South China Sea - Video Report 3/9/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^
| March 9, 2009
| BrianinMO
Posted on 03/09/2009 1:15:19 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot
Here is a video report by Jim Miklazewski at the Pentagon on news that the USS Impeccable, an unarmed U.S. Navy ship, was harassed yesterday by 5 Chinese Ships in International Waters. The Impeccable is a minesweeper, and reportedly used water canon to force one of the Chinese ships away that was attempting to latch onto the Impeccable with a grappling hook. The incident took place in international waters in the South China Sea, about 75 miles south of Hainan Island. The United States has reportedly lodged a protest with the Chinese Government. . . . . . (Watch Video Report)
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...
TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: china; piracy; tm; ussimpeccable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Federalist Patriot
This is worse than what was earlier reported, I don’t recall them saying they tried to hook on to the Impeccable.
And I just love how the US is going to “protest”.
“You better stop it or I’m going to lodge a formal complaint!”
2
posted on
03/09/2009 1:23:21 PM PDT
by
autumnraine
(Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
To: Federalist Patriot
What’s Urkel and Thunder Thighs going to do?
3
posted on
03/09/2009 1:23:29 PM PDT
by
Leisler
To: Federalist Patriot
“one of the Chinese ships away that was attempting to latch onto the Impeccable with a grappling hook.”
In international waters?
And 0bama says what. “Stop it”?
5:1. Brave. Very brave.
4
posted on
03/09/2009 1:24:51 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(Leave America poor, hungry, sick and defenseless. Wasn't that the plan? How's that Hopenchange now?)
To: Federalist Patriot
SOunds like another surveillance plane ploy to me. Good that the Impeccable managed to not hit any of the Chinese ships or they would have had to mess up whatever equipment they have on board the Clintons did not already sell to China.
5
posted on
03/09/2009 1:24:52 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Jeff Head
6
posted on
03/09/2009 1:25:51 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Federalist Patriot
i believe unleashing one of these would solve the problem
(and yes... i think googling for this put me on someone's list...)
7
posted on
03/09/2009 1:27:23 PM PDT
by
sten
To: Federalist Patriot
The Impeccable is a minesweeper.... Riiiight.
To: sten
i think googling for this put me on someone's list, Pshaw - we don't care.
9
posted on
03/09/2009 1:30:07 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Save the Hispaniolan Solenodon!)
To: Federalist Patriot
Sounds like attempted piracy.
10
posted on
03/09/2009 1:30:24 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(Palin-Limbaugh 2012)
To: MeganC
Why would any US Navy ship be unarmed?
11
posted on
03/09/2009 1:32:30 PM PDT
by
sean_og
(--... ...--)
To: sean_og
12
posted on
03/09/2009 1:34:48 PM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
To: sean_og
13
posted on
03/09/2009 1:36:17 PM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
To: Federalist Patriot
It's not a "minesweeper"
http://www.msc.navy.mil/annualreport/2001/pm2.htm
Ocean Surveillance Seven government-owned ships and one chartered vessel supported the Navy's undersea surveillance needs in FY 2001. USNS Prevail, USNS Assertive, USNS Bold, USNS Loyal, USNS Victorious, USNS Able, USNS Effective and MV Cory Chouest worked directly with units from the Navys numbered fleets. MV Cory Chouest, a privately owned and MSC-chartered ship, also continued to test a new sonar system. This new system will be installed on a new MSC surveillance vessel, USNS Impeccable, to provide both active and passive sonar capabilities. Impeccable was under construction as of Sept. 30, 2001.
It's a spy ship, not a minesweeper, and that's according to the USN.
14
posted on
03/09/2009 1:37:28 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(Palin-Limbaugh 2012)
To: sean_og
Lots of USNS vessels are unarmed.
15
posted on
03/09/2009 1:37:32 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
To: Non-Sequitur
Ignorant journalists strike again.
16
posted on
03/09/2009 1:37:45 PM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
To: stuartcr; sean_og
The title and article get PLENTY of stuff wrong here.
17
posted on
03/09/2009 1:38:46 PM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
To: sten
Yes, raking the enemy’s bridge with that at close range would definitely do the trick.
18
posted on
03/09/2009 1:39:00 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: Federalist Patriot
Somebody forgot to tell the Navy we were giving them the ship. Clinton and Obama had already made a deal.
I hope the captain won't get in trouble for forgetting our new appeasement and surrender policies.
19
posted on
03/09/2009 1:43:06 PM PDT
by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: sean_og
“...Why would any US Navy ship be unarmed?...”
So as NOT to offend any potential enemies of the USA. (/sarc)
20
posted on
03/09/2009 1:48:33 PM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(DRILL NOW. DRILL OFTEN. DRILL 24/7/365. PAY LESS. SUCK THE GROUND DRY.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson