Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Impeccable Harassed by Five Chinese Ships in South China Sea - Video Report 3/9/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | March 9, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 03/09/2009 1:15:19 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot

Here is a video report by Jim Miklazewski at the Pentagon on news that the USS Impeccable, an unarmed U.S. Navy ship, was harassed yesterday by 5 Chinese Ships in International Waters. The Impeccable is a minesweeper, and reportedly used water canon to force one of the Chinese ships away that was attempting to latch onto the Impeccable with a grappling hook. The incident took place in international waters in the South China Sea, about 75 miles south of Hainan Island. The United States has reportedly lodged a protest with the Chinese Government. . . . . . (Watch Video Report)

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: china; piracy; tm; ussimpeccable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2009 1:15:20 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

This is worse than what was earlier reported, I don’t recall them saying they tried to hook on to the Impeccable.

And I just love how the US is going to “protest”.

“You better stop it or I’m going to lodge a formal complaint!”


2 posted on 03/09/2009 1:23:21 PM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

What’s Urkel and Thunder Thighs going to do?


3 posted on 03/09/2009 1:23:29 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

“one of the Chinese ships away that was attempting to latch onto the Impeccable with a grappling hook.”

In international waters?

And 0bama says what. “Stop it”?

5:1. Brave. Very brave.


4 posted on 03/09/2009 1:24:51 PM PDT by combat_boots (Leave America poor, hungry, sick and defenseless. Wasn't that the plan? How's that Hopenchange now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

SOunds like another surveillance plane ploy to me. Good that the Impeccable managed to not hit any of the Chinese ships or they would have had to mess up whatever equipment they have on board the Clintons did not already sell to China.


5 posted on 03/09/2009 1:24:52 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

ping!


6 posted on 03/09/2009 1:25:51 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
i believe unleashing one of these would solve the problem

(and yes... i think googling for this put me on someone's list...)

7 posted on 03/09/2009 1:27:23 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
The Impeccable is a minesweeper....

Riiiight.

8 posted on 03/09/2009 1:28:53 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten
i think googling for this put me on someone's list,

Pshaw - we don't care.

9 posted on 03/09/2009 1:30:07 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (Save the Hispaniolan Solenodon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Sounds like attempted piracy.


10 posted on 03/09/2009 1:30:24 PM PDT by MeganC (Palin-Limbaugh 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Why would any US Navy ship be unarmed?


11 posted on 03/09/2009 1:32:30 PM PDT by sean_og (--... ...--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sean_og

It’s run by civilians.


12 posted on 03/09/2009 1:34:48 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sean_og

It’s actually a Military Sealift Command ship, USNS Impeccable.

Wiki link for a little more info.

http://www.msc.navy.mil/inventory/ships.asp?ship=106&type=OceanSurveillanceShip


13 posted on 03/09/2009 1:36:17 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
It's not a "minesweeper"

http://www.msc.navy.mil/annualreport/2001/pm2.htm

Ocean Surveillance Seven government-owned ships and one chartered vessel supported the Navy's undersea surveillance needs in FY 2001. USNS Prevail, USNS Assertive, USNS Bold, USNS Loyal, USNS Victorious, USNS Able, USNS Effective and MV Cory Chouest worked directly with units from the Navy’s numbered fleets. MV Cory Chouest, a privately owned and MSC-chartered ship, also continued to test a new sonar system. This new system will be installed on a new MSC surveillance vessel, USNS Impeccable, to provide both active and passive sonar capabilities. Impeccable was under construction as of Sept. 30, 2001.

It's a spy ship, not a minesweeper, and that's according to the USN.

14 posted on 03/09/2009 1:37:28 PM PDT by MeganC (Palin-Limbaugh 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sean_og

Lots of USNS vessels are unarmed.


15 posted on 03/09/2009 1:37:32 PM PDT by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Ignorant journalists strike again.


16 posted on 03/09/2009 1:37:45 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr; sean_og

The title and article get PLENTY of stuff wrong here.


17 posted on 03/09/2009 1:38:46 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (Want to make a conservative angry? Lie to him. Want to make a liberal angry? Tell him the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sten

Yes, raking the enemy’s bridge with that at close range would definitely do the trick.


18 posted on 03/09/2009 1:39:00 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Somebody forgot to tell the Navy we were giving them the ship. Clinton and Obama had already made a deal.
I hope the captain won't get in trouble for forgetting our new appeasement and surrender policies.
19 posted on 03/09/2009 1:43:06 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sean_og

“...Why would any US Navy ship be unarmed?...”

So as NOT to offend any potential enemies of the USA. (/sarc)


20 posted on 03/09/2009 1:48:33 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (DRILL NOW. DRILL OFTEN. DRILL 24/7/365. PAY LESS. SUCK THE GROUND DRY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson