Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Al B.

But would Sarah risk alientating the pro-life community by giving this decision too much attention? Wouldn’t she be walking a fine line?


19 posted on 03/05/2009 8:22:45 AM PST by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: techno

Did you really expect us all to run arounf like our hair was on fire from your posting this article?


24 posted on 03/05/2009 8:29:30 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: techno
Sure she's walking a fine line and that's exactly the way the Obama thugs in Alaska want it. They're going to do everything they can to bring her down in 2010 if she decides to seek re-election. They better hope she decides to run for governor in 2010 because if she doesn't, it means she's decided to go for the gold in 2012.

In the end I'm 100% convinced she came down on the side of what's best for Alaska. I trust her and she's yet to challenge my trust. JMO.

30 posted on 03/05/2009 8:32:09 AM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: techno
But would Sarah risk alientating the pro-life community by giving this decision too much attention? Wouldn’t she be walking a fine line?

No, because the pro-life community is a lot more intelligent than you are giving it credit.

55 posted on 03/05/2009 8:54:13 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson