To: Shellybenoit
In the same article, he also said he voted for O and believes in O’s agenda.
To: Shellybenoit
Odd, he is a liberal until it affects his bottom line. Wouldn’t it sink in after a while that the goals he seeks don’t correlate with his beliefs? Namely, he is for more socialized medicine, but not if it affects the profit line. He sees now that it affects the profit line, but is still for it (just not now)?
I’m confused.
4 posted on
03/05/2009 7:59:46 AM PST by
Husker
To: Shellybenoit
The fragile ego of our new President is being communicated via his administrative staff.
The blowback is fun to watch. Obama has picked a fight with quite a few that have airtime, big audiences, and most importantly FACTS on their side.
Its a war he’s already lost. The amusing part is nobody within this administration realizes it yet.
5 posted on
03/05/2009 7:59:50 AM PST by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: Shellybenoit
If it helps his ratings, I’m sure he would blow up watermelons.
6 posted on
03/05/2009 8:00:34 AM PST by
BGHater
(Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
To: Shellybenoit
And when they get there, if times are good, we can have them give back or pay higher taxes.The man has no principles. Wealth confiscation is no good in a down economy; but, hey, when times are good, tax, tax, tax away!
12 posted on
03/05/2009 8:16:15 AM PST by
kevao
To: Shellybenoit
Wow, talk about buyer’s remorse!
You know what they say about payback ...
Not that I believe McCain would have been much (if any) better on financial matters.
14 posted on
03/05/2009 8:16:43 AM PST by
Lorianne
To: Shellybenoit
Happy to see the feisty ones stand firm. ‘Army of 10,000 that Obama might not know about’ indeed. Molon Labe.
17 posted on
03/05/2009 8:31:04 AM PST by
bboop
(obama, little o, not a Real God)
To: Shellybenoit
Jim Cramer doesn’t have 20 MILLION people behind him to care when he gets lambasted by the administration.
18 posted on
03/05/2009 8:38:38 AM PST by
J40000
To: Shellybenoit
19 posted on
03/05/2009 8:46:31 AM PST by
Betis70
To: Shellybenoit
Here is a prime reason that Cramer is a major douche bag: from the article...
tinkering with the mortgage deduction at a time when U.S. house price depreciation is behind much of the world's morass and certainly the devastation affecting our banks, and pushing an aggressive cap and trade program that could raise the price of energy for millions of people.
I actually embrace every part of Obama's agenda, right down to the increase on personal taxes and the mortgage deduction. I am a fierce environmentalist who has donated multiple acres to the state of New Jersey to keep forever wild. I believe in cap and trade.
I met this clown in NYC a couple of years ago. He is a first class sleazebag, his anti oblamma comments notwithstanding...
23 posted on
03/05/2009 9:04:00 AM PST by
steel_resolve
(I don't see how the Obama administration leads to anything but civil war...)
To: Shellybenoit
This is getting interesting considering Cramer is a Democrat.
25 posted on
03/05/2009 9:06:32 AM PST by
TruthWillWin
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
To: Shellybenoit
Cramer *supports* Obama’s agenda.
Cramer also wants to kill the goose laying the golden eggs (capitalism), just not all at once. While a lot of people are terminally stupid, Cramer should know better.
28 posted on
03/05/2009 10:42:43 AM PST by
JHBowden
(Keep the Change!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson