CNN reports that Michelle Obama has a nice, firm pair of…

IHateTheMedia.com ^ | 03/03/09

[slomark]

[photo]

Arms, for God’s sake. The story is about Michelle Obama’s arms. Get your mind out of the gutter.

But consider it proof that there is no aspect of the Obamas’ lives too trivial to be glorified by the press.

CNN breathlessly reports that Michelle Obama’s arms are very toned. She can be seen on the March cover of Vogue magazine (gasp) in a sleeveless dress. She also (double gasp) wore a sleeveless dress to the president’s speech to the joint session of Congress. And now (triple gasp) she’s on the cover of People magazine in yet another sleeveless dress.

“The Obama effect has been...

(my note: BARF!)

[deannadurbin]

Who cares if she has nice arms if her beliefs are communistic corn beef hash?

[jersey117]

CNN is an embarrassment and shouldn’t even be called a news organization at this point.

[misterrob]

Does the woman need to be objectified as much as she is?

BFD

[mortal19440]

Is that why she is always sleeveless? Maybe she should just wear a Guinea (Wife beater) Tee all the time.

[Red in Blue PA]

Great.

She can dish out the soup in the soup lines with her buffed arms.

[rbmillerjr]

The continued attempt by the media and cultural elite to make Barry and Michelle, Camelot II.

She has been labeled as “beautiful, a model, and finely toned”

The truth is that she can’t even dress properly and she is not an attractive women. I’m not trying to be crude but just myth busting.

I suppose if they are pretty Socialists, that makes it better somehow,,,but they are not pretty./

[IbJensen]

Isn't this sophomoric gushing over the First Family absolutely nauseating.

To us, who know better, this would be embarrassing to the max!

[Batman11]

“She has been labeled as “beautiful, a model, and finely toned”

For petes sake, she looks like a shorter Patrick Ewing in drag! These people are delusional!

[Dallas59]

[lilycicero]

Mine would look better w/a tan.......just sayin

[J40000]

I wanna see her arm-wrastle -and whoop!- Chris Matthews!

[CrazyIvan]

CNN breathlessly reports that Michelle Obama’s arms are very toned. She can be seen on the March cover of Vogue magazine (gasp) in a sleeveless dress. She also (double gasp) wore a sleeveless dress to the president’s speech to the joint session of Congress. And now (triple gasp) she’s on the cover of People magazine in yet another sleeveless dress.

The only “Right to bare arms” the Obamas believe in.

[gargoyle]

...If yer going to fancy first ladys, who would come to mind...

...Fer me, Rosalynn Carter, and Michelle Obama, my choice for a pair of fine looking first ladys...

[mountn man]

I don't remember the media raving about Laura or the Bush girls.

Laura is truly beautiful, unlike the need to prop Michelle up. And the Bush girls are hot.

[mountn man]

Next the media will claim that sleeveless dresses are the rage everywhere, and stores can't keep them in stock. (which will probably be true, as all the followers must follow a trend)

Didn't hear much from the MSM about the fact that after Sarahs speech at the GOP, requests for her glasses were off the wall.

The MSM "NEEDS" to talk about Michelle and her looks, to try and create something.

The same MSM went to all lengths to avoid stating the OBVIOUS with Sarah. In fact, the MSM, when it did mention anything about Sarahs beauty was always with disdain and scorn.

[matginzac]

LOL! VERY clever!

[Constitution Day]

Isn't this sophomoric gushing over the First Family absolutely nauseating.
To us, who know better, this would be embarrassing to the max!

Um, have you ever seen the "Day in the Life of President Bush" threads that used to be posted here on FR?

Bordering on cult worship, they are nauseating in the extreme.

I miss President Bush a bit, but emphatically NOT those puerile threads.

[timestax]

And CNN had better pay their Taxes too! !

[timestax]

And CNN had better pay their Taxes too! !