[Candor7]

I did read the post. Amy siskind is seeking support from her feminist peers. She knows full well what her position should be. The timidity exhibited by the left is simply a further manifestation of the lefts cultural acceptance of the sado masochistic aspects of Islamic culture which sets their little pussies aglow.

Thats the problem, many feminists liketo sit alone at home and fantasize about being dominated by a violent well endowed man, simply because their relationship to men is out of balance, and they often long for reconciliation in their own psyches.And this foolishness is the result.

If Amy would stand on her own two feet with some courage, she would be much further ahead of this deadly game now being played out in the context of Obama, who will encourage the current feminist malaise, and disempower them completely as time goes on.

This is an issue that should be carried by fine conservative women whose numbers are legion in this country.If ever there was a time for THEM to exercise their voices, it is NOW.

[theothercheek]

Amy Siskind started The New Agenda as an alternative to NOW to allow pro-life and pro-abortion feminists to come together to tackle issues other than abortion that NOW has ignored. The New Agenda - and Amy personally - supported the McCain-Palin ticket even though she was a top Dem fundraiser. All the feminist Dems who thought their party pulled a fast one and robbed Hillary Clinton of the nomination and supported McCain-Palin sent a shock wave through the Dem and feminist establishments. I’d say Amy is pretty brave, if misguided on why this case doesn’t fit neatly inside the “violence against women” category.