Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court have been ordered to throw out any case (Plains radio)
plains radio ^

Posted on 01/28/2009 5:24:15 AM PST by dascallie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: dascallie

Ordered by WHO? And if the SCOTUS have started taking orders, we are all screwed and it’s time for a Revofreakinglution.


21 posted on 01/28/2009 5:46:55 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Ah, you are so wrong.
The picture means everything.

Their Orders were the US Constitution and
the Canons of Judicial conduct, which demand there be
no appearance of impropriety, and a natural born
citizen in the White House..

They met with the litigant before their deepsixing
the Pet. Cert. and the Constitution they swore
(and lied) to uphold.


22 posted on 01/28/2009 5:46:58 AM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tunedin
Who has the authority to order SCOTUS to do such a thing?

Whoever has a gun to the head of the Justices' loved ones. Don't you watch "24?"

23 posted on 01/28/2009 5:48:05 AM PST by CholeraJoe (You think I'm crazy? I got your crazy right here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
so Bush didn't request a picture big deal.

If your concerned about the Obamaination not being an American Citizen. even though his mother was a natural born American Citizen, then you have to figure that this is still in the works, or has been thrown out by the court.

I do believe there are still cases out there. Some of the cases that have been unceremoniously dumped by the court were prepared badly.

24 posted on 01/28/2009 5:48:12 AM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Bush didn’t have a “Meeting” with the justices.

He obviously did not feel the “need” to—why do you think Obama “did”?

Obama has covered the bases.


25 posted on 01/28/2009 5:51:04 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
they met with the president elect of the United States!

what planet are you from?

In stead of trying to beat this dead horse, I suggest you do all you can to make sure that in 2010 there is a solid majority in both houses of congress and in 2012 make sure that this Hussein turd is unceremoniously voted out.

If perchance the administration goes too far (which looks quite possible each day), I suggest you get your state to secede....

26 posted on 01/28/2009 5:53:53 AM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
This was the same source that was going to present a "divorce decree" but never came thru.

They must be operating out of the basement of that African news service that gave us a big run-around and then disappeared.

Some people have nothing better to do than cook up theses scams (and collect welfare checks).

If Acorn gets their govt. grant, we can expect a lot more of this.

27 posted on 01/28/2009 5:54:02 AM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
No one has the authority to even give such an order.

I think the email is a hoax.

That said, you concern yourself with legalisms too much. Even a Supreme Court Justice would pay attention upon being told that a certain decision would trigger riots where his safety, and the safety of everyone he cares about, could not be guaranteed.

28 posted on 01/28/2009 5:54:18 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

"It wasn't an 'order', it was a 'suggestion'."

29 posted on 01/28/2009 5:54:59 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

your speculating....show me the facts.


30 posted on 01/28/2009 5:55:07 AM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
The AntiCHRIST
31 posted on 01/28/2009 5:55:34 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty ("Let his days be few, and let another take his office." Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

I am confident he has a weakness somewhere, we need to find it, exploit it, defeat it and ultimately educate others for our future generations of how to defend against it.

If we do not act we are giving our sons and daughters a society that will cripple them, they will be pawns to a shackled society.

Or are we just going to quit and take it out on our family?

Its already happening, complete families gone because they were not capable of standing up and saying NO.

What happened in LA is just a preview of things to come, there is always an alternative.


32 posted on 01/28/2009 5:57:41 AM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

They got the divorce degree. They have both decrees from both marriages.


33 posted on 01/28/2009 5:59:11 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; dascallie

Isn’t it true Obama requested and convened a meeting with the justices earlier in the week? The fact Obama is a defendant in a case to be tried by these same justices, is cause for suspicion of the worst kind of tampering with the judicial system. And, the fact that the meeting was ex parte further adds to the suspicion. Transparency, my ass.


34 posted on 01/28/2009 5:59:38 AM PST by RLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
" ... Even a Supreme Court Justice would pay attention upon being told that a certain decision would trigger riots where his safety, and the safety of everyone he cares about, could not be guaranteed."


Likewise, even a Supreme Court would realize that ruling Obama a non citizen would toss the country into chaos.

Why else would not the little zer0 have to produce proof of his birth place?

35 posted on 01/28/2009 6:00:00 AM PST by G.Mason (If you surrender your right to own a gun, you surrender your right to your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

One thing is for sure anymore. WE THE PEOPLE have no protection from a totally corrupt and greedy government.

Their idea all along was to usher in this fraud to destroy us.

They have swiped our savings and will continue to raid what is left of it, take away our freedom and leave us totally dependent on THEM. Which is what is really behind all of this chaos.

We have been so had. So disgusting. I despise them.


36 posted on 01/28/2009 6:00:15 AM PST by dforest (life is now good again....he has been inaugurated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earlJam

Obamacide?


37 posted on 01/28/2009 6:00:30 AM PST by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
How in the H did such an insane thing happen?

Maybe God is angry.

38 posted on 01/28/2009 6:00:37 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

The fact is it can be seen as “improper’ that the litigant meets with the judges while the litigant’s case is in closed conference with those very same judges.

What part of that do you not get?


39 posted on 01/28/2009 6:00:46 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
...they met with the president elect of the United States!

Actually, they met with the defendant, who was President-Select, and
would be Present-Elect only if they ignored the case.

Your lack of accuracy perhaps accounts for your myopia.

40 posted on 01/28/2009 6:00:51 AM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson