[mysterio]

It’s a first amendment issue. FR, DU, and every other political site on the net are protected speech.

[magslinger]

It’s a first amendment issue. FR, DU, and every other political site on the net are protected speech.

Right. And the right to keep and bear arms is absolutely protected by the Second Amendment.

I am not donning my tinfoil toque, yet, but in light of the attack on Rush, I am noting it.

[bpjam]

The First Amendment doesn’t protect you from socialist ACORN hackers though. It just won’t be Obama himself snooping through your files or censoring your websurfing, it will be one of his unholy minions at Google, Youtube or some other one.

[TBP]

FR, DU, and every other political site on the net are protected speech.

Not in the People's Republic of Obama.

[ml/nj]

It’s a first amendment issue. FR, DU, and every other political site on the net are protected speech.

Yeah. And it's sort of a Constitutional requirement that the person assuming the Presidency should be a natural born citizen. The Constitution is DEAD. There are no rules any more, save the ones made up by the people with the guns.

ML/NJ

[Dr.Zoidberg]

It’s a first amendment issue. FR, DU, and every other political site on the net are protected speech.

Which means absolutely nothing to a team of hackers or thugs with sledgehammers if they decide lowtek is the better way to serve the obamanation.

Nor for that matter SCOTUS considering some of their recent decisions.

It maybe tinfoilhattery, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with setting up a second and third and fourth method of contacting like minded people.

[JimRed]

It’s a first amendment issue. FR, DU, and every other political site on the net are protected speech.

But, once they've done away with the second amendment the first will be unenforceable!