Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Examine the history of destructive ideas: Inbred Science
1 posted on 01/24/2009 5:28:03 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; SeekAndFind; Fichori; metmom; tpanther; ToGodBeTheGlory; little jeremiah; ...
Ism ping!

2 posted on 01/24/2009 5:38:00 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
[My Christian friends, I am a Socialist, and as such believe in, and work for, universal freedom, and universal brotherhood, and universal peace.]

Socialism is the religion of atheism and all its tenants and doctrines are anti Christ and therefore doomed to failure. The history of marxism is continued abject failure and the cost has always been blood, sorrow, death, and misery and though socialism always is vain, vain people continue to try and create a utopia out of sinners and without God and His Only Begotten Son Jesus Christ, a nation is destined to failure as has been proved over and over again and again.
Unless the one true and living God of Israel be in it, the house is built in vain. Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord but sin is a reproach to any people.
Come LORD Jesus, rule and reign in the midst of all thine enemies.

3 posted on 01/24/2009 5:51:15 AM PST by kindred (Conservatives have 4 years to start a new conservative party or lose more elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
If you discard "Creation" and accept evolution; if you discard " revelation " and accept evolution; if you discard miracles and accept natural law, there is nothing left of the Christian Religion...

Which is the whole goal of this group to begin with.

4 posted on 01/24/2009 6:15:45 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
First, absolutely anything you are likely to hear from a raving atheist of today has already been said (word-for-word) by Blatchford in 1904 -- it is quite striking to see this -- proving once again that every atheist book is just like every other atheist book.

So true.

It's enough to make you believe that these guys ghosts are posting on FR.

5 posted on 01/24/2009 6:19:23 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; valkyry1
As I said before, if the theory of evolution be true, there was nothing to atone for, and nobody to atone. Man has never sifined against God. In fact, the whole of this old Christian doctrine is a mass of error. There was no creation. There was no Fall. There was no Atonement. There was no Adam, and no Eve, and no Eden, and no Devil, and no Hell.

They think that if they can make one part of the Bible out to be a lie, they can make the whole thing out to be a lie.

The same goes for any part of the Bible, whether it's disproving the Flood, that certain people or groups of people never existed which were mentioned in the OT, that there's no *secular* or outside sources that mention Jesus to *verify* the Gospels, that the miracles done by Jesus were not really miracles after all, whatever the argument is to discredit Scripture.

If they can find an excuse to reject one part, no matter how insignificant, if justifies them rejecting it all.

6 posted on 01/24/2009 6:27:08 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

read later, and archive for future reference!


19 posted on 01/24/2009 8:53:51 AM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware of socialism in America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
You seem to be willing to go to any length to defeat the theory of evolution...

...short of actually producing any evidence against the theory.

But I guess if you didn't have Borking and character assassination you wouldn't have anything at all. What a joke!

22 posted on 01/24/2009 9:41:28 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

liberalism...

cultism...


49 posted on 01/24/2009 3:52:02 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

12. Another lesson which we can draw is that the different branches of knowledge call for different methods. Thanks to his intuition as a brilliant physicist and by relying on different arguments, Galileo, who practically invented the experimental method, understood why only the Sun could function as the centre of the world, as it was then known, that is to say as a planetary system. The error of the theologians of the time, when they maintained the centrality of the Earth, was to think that our understanding of the physical world’s structure was, in some way, imposed by the literal sense of the Sacred Scripture. Let us recall the celebrated saying attributed to Baronius: “Spiritui Sancto mentem fuisse nos docere quomodo ad coelum eatur non quomodo coelum gradiatur.” In fact the Bible does not concern itself with the details of the physical world, the understanding of which is the competence of human experience and reasoning. There exist two realms of knowledge, one which has its source in Revelation and one which reason can discover by its own power. To the latter belong especially the experimental sciences and philosophy. The distinction between the two realms of knowledge ought not to be understood as opposition. The two realms are not altogether foreign to each other; they have points of contact. The methodologies proper to each make it possible to bring out different aspects of reality...

Excerpt from the speech of Pope John Paul II to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1992


84 posted on 01/25/2009 9:48:34 PM PST by cacoethes_resipisco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson