I suggest it does. Obama was 22 when that law was passed. If he was indeed born overseas then any birth certificate would have been filed under the earlier laws. Was it even allowed?
Seems to me its not unreasonable to ask that Obama produce his vault copy of whatever birth records he has to judicial review. PERIOD. That is ALL anyone is asking.
And you would have a better chance of forcing such a disclosure if you could provide some evidence supporting your belief Obama was not born in the U.S. I don't think a court in the land will touch it without some evidence Obama is lying.
Nope. The only people it doesn’t matter to are Obama supporters who don’t give a fig whether he’s natural born or not.
If Hawaiian law admits to ‘altered’ certificates, as well as allows judicial review of those certificates as evidence, than Hawaiian law would subsequently allow for that same judicial review of Obama. Since no one knows what those documents actually say, or whether or not they’ve been altered, then it most certainly does matter. Only a non-constitutionalist would suggest that it doesn’t matter. Trust me: If Obama were a Republican IT WOULD MATTER.
And you still have yet to make a case for why you (I presume a Citizen of the USA) should have to provide your certified birth certificate to the DMV just to be able to drive a car, while Obama, who is about to become the most powerful man in the world - does not. I have yet to see an Obama supporter such as yourself answer that question satisfactorily.
20 years ago I had to prove my child was a citizen and had to provide a certified copy of that child’s birth certificate just to play softball.
It is ludicrous that a man about to have his hand on the nuclear button, does not.
As to there being no evidence that Obama was not born in the U.S. - you obviously have not been reading this thread. A forgery is clear evidence that something is amiss. And the burden of proof is not ‘on us’. Its on Obama and he has consistently failed to comply.