Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativegramma
Under HRS 338-17.8...

That law was adopted in 1982. What did the earlier laws say?

118 posted on 01/06/2009 5:50:08 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
That law was adopted in 1982. What did the earlier laws say?

I would argue that doesn't matter. HRS 338-17 states:

Late or altered certificate as evidence. The probative value of a “late” or “altered” certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. [L 1949, c 327, §21; RL 1955, §57-20; HRS §338-17; am L 1997, c 305, §4]

Notice the dates prior to 1961. Because the website of the Hawaii Department of Health" states:

"Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) A PERSON BORN IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY." -

Seems to me its not unreasonable to ask that Obama produce his vault copy of whatever birth records he has to judicial review. PERIOD. That is ALL anyone is asking.

121 posted on 01/06/2009 6:25:30 PM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson