Replies

Oh, gosh no. It was not meant for you. I'm sorry you got the wrong impression.

Thanks for clarifying that, Polarik.

First of all, I have never identified myself as a "forensics expert" on my Affidavits as there is no need to do so. There is no formal field known as "document image forensics," and therefore, no such thing as a "certified expert in document image forensics."

Are your affidavits being used in any of the pending litigation?

There's a well established field called Questionable Documents (or is it "questioned?"), for which there are a couple widely recognized certifications, but I believe its focus is still largely on hard copy, handwriting analysis, etc. The type of analysis at hand would probably be best described as a hybrid of QD and digital image forensics, which also has a lot of overlap with the forensic video field.

What I was saying by my comment is that "Forensics" is not synonymous with "CSI"...

Amen.

My Affidavits were submitted two months ago in reference to three pending cases, and with Berg's, it makes four. However, Berg's writ and injunction are the only firm dates of action this month that I know about.

If i hear of anything, I'll let you know.