Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Let's see ... there's a poster who understands and is conversant with the latest science as presented in the journals that cover it ...

... versus a poster who has demonstrated slovenly thought, contempt for accuracy, and a distinct lack of reading ability. (I quote from your last post to me, "You didn't mention we had to search for Ichneumon." I didn't mention it because you didn't have to. That was the point of the link. Or didn't you notice?)

I'll go with the first one.

By the way, your typing is greatly improved. Who's doing it for you?

593 posted on 01/05/2009 8:01:06 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs

[[versus a poster who has demonstrated slovenly thought, contempt for accuracy, and a distinct lack of reading ability.]]

Swell- bust out hte insults- ‘contempt for accuracy’? BS- you show me where I have ‘contempt for accuracy’ infact I DEMAND accuracy- somethign that is in short demand aroudn the campfires of Macroevolution

[[I didn’t mention it because you didn’t have to. That was the point of the link. Or didn’t you notice?)]]

I made it clear I didn’t- Now who’s not paying attention? Shall I accuse you now of slovenly htought?

[[By the way, your typing is greatly improved. Who’s doing it for you?]]

tee hee hee hardy har har- Thought I was conversing with a grown up- apparently not


595 posted on 01/05/2009 8:06:18 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs

[[Let’s see ... there’s a poster who understands and is conversant with the latest science as presented in the journals that cover it ...]]

Translation= A poster who has the same a priori assumptions as the scientists that he cites, and who ALSO ignores the impossibilites associated with Macroevoltuion Vs. Someone who consistently exposes this FACT and provides evdience on a daily basis that exposes the fallicies of the claims made by those same said scientists

I’m betting $100 you’ll go with the first one because he posts long winded threads that use words too big for most people to understand without effort, and which make his posts ‘look official’ because they carry the estemed title of ‘science’- despite hte FACT that this same said sciecne lacks ANY evidence to back it up and worse yet, the evidence which does exist refutes the assumptive driven claims being made in said scientific articles! But no worries- they have ‘big words’- tyhat’s all that matters apparently


600 posted on 01/05/2009 8:12:26 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson