[[Let’s see ... there’s a poster who understands and is conversant with the latest science as presented in the journals that cover it ...]]
Translation= A poster who has the same a priori assumptions as the scientists that he cites, and who ALSO ignores the impossibilites associated with Macroevoltuion Vs. Someone who consistently exposes this FACT and provides evdience on a daily basis that exposes the fallicies of the claims made by those same said scientists
I’m betting $100 you’ll go with the first one because he posts long winded threads that use words too big for most people to understand without effort, and which make his posts ‘look official’ because they carry the estemed title of ‘science’- despite hte FACT that this same said sciecne lacks ANY evidence to back it up and worse yet, the evidence which does exist refutes the assumptive driven claims being made in said scientific articles! But no worries- they have ‘big words’- tyhat’s all that matters apparently
“because he posts long winded threads that use words too big for most people to understand without effort”
Because learning is BAD.