I've seen lists of facts and pings to outside sources. But you have never, ever told me what you think Darwin's theory is, or why you feel it is correct.
OK, I see where this is going.
I post good solid science here for years and you casually dismiss as just "lists of facts and pings to outside sources."
I regret to have to tell you this, but you wouldn't know real science if it bit you just abaft of the acetabulum. And you wouldn't know what to do with it if it did.
You're a disgrace to the post Enlightenment era, but I think you've found your niche. Enjoy it, but don't confuse what you do with science.
[[Enjoy it, but don’t confuse what you do with science.]]
Why not? You do! I’veseen you ‘list of’ “Solid Science” and quite frankly, there is nothing ‘solid’ about the claims and wild assumptions you point to- Don’t try to pretend they are anythign but, because We’ve investigated them and found them severely wanting for substance and actual scientific evidence- You can keep on with your ‘nose i nthe air’ insults, but it doesn’t do anythign to prop up the assumptions based science you link to
No where its going is you do that you does that with everything you post, that way you are off the hook in the inevitable event some of it turns out wrong false or fraudulent.