Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

[[Enjoy it, but don’t confuse what you do with science.]]

Why not? You do! I’veseen you ‘list of’ “Solid Science” and quite frankly, there is nothing ‘solid’ about the claims and wild assumptions you point to- Don’t try to pretend they are anythign but, because We’ve investigated them and found them severely wanting for substance and actual scientific evidence- You can keep on with your ‘nose i nthe air’ insults, but it doesn’t do anythign to prop up the assumptions based science you link to


585 posted on 01/05/2009 7:36:57 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
Why not? You do! I’veseen you ‘list of’ “Solid Science” and quite frankly, there is nothing ‘solid’ about the claims and wild assumptions you point to- Don’t try to pretend they are anythign but, because We’ve investigated them and found them severely wanting for substance and actual scientific evidence-

So, it's pretty much the consensus that the folks at FR have debunked modern scientific thought? Why is it that it hasn't convinced the scientific community or society at large?

Science thrives on being challenged and changing its theories to incorporate new facts. Conversely, religion is just the opposite. So, if you think you've won the argument, there isn't any proof of it.

837 posted on 01/06/2009 4:48:59 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson