LOL! I’ll give you this: you’ve more brass than a marching band. If you find my behavior objectionable then hit the abuse button. It’s not your place to issue warnings or dictate actions. Leave that to the moderators. It’s beginning to dawn on you that you’re in over your head, I think. Is it that you’re looking for a way out, and your solution is to imitate ’yoteman and exit playing the martyr?
”I've repeated the facts here over and over again . . .”
You state the same talking points repeatedly. When your arguments are refuted, you don’t know anything better than to restate them again. You’re a one-load chamber and when your shot proves a dud, you don’t know what to do next. So you’re left with nothing but to re-chamber and again fire a dud.
By the way, when a scientist is asked a scientific question about God, since he is equipped (by choice) with nothing but a materialistic methodology, as a scientist he must necessarily answer, “I don’t know."
”Now if you angrily . . .”
Yada, yada, yada. As I predicted: great bellowing clouds of smoke and deny, deny, deny.
”So I don't think the voice of religion is being stifled in any way shape or form.”
? Context?
Hmmmm... don't I remember seeing some pretty ominous sounding warnings from YHAOS? So is that the new Free Republic rule? YHAOS can warn, intimidate and insult all he wants, but no one else can warn, intimidate or insult YHAOS?
Funny, I don't remember seeing that rule written down anywhere... ;-)
Sorry pal, but you have not actually refuted any of my arguments. All you've done is insult me, and "yada yada yada"...
We should note, by contrast, schaef21 has offered detailed and serious arguments, including virtually no insults. I've actually enjoyed those exchanges, and if I weren't wasting so much time on you, could put more effort into responding.
So why don't you just sit quietly, listen and learn something for a change? ;-)