tpanther: Which is undoubtedly part of the problem. It's akin to counting on NBC for the definition of what is or isn't journalism.
BroJoeK: "theories (confirmed hypotheses)."
tpanther: really?
Like string theory and multiverse theory have been "confirmed"?
If I understand your words, you're trying to tell us that all of "mainstream science," is just bunk, right?
And I'm supposed to believe this on the grounds that they won't publish your "Creation Science" or "Intelligent Design" "scientific results," right?
Sorry, but I don't think so...
As for your cogent point about "string theory" and "multiverse theory," I couldn't say how much "confirmation" they have. But I would readily agree that the popular press is far too eager to label every young scientist's intellectual wet dream a "theory." No doubt some of these "theories" are more accurately called "hypotheses."
Uh-huh and how many string and multiverse theorists have been dragged to sourt to be shut up?
It’s a simple problem really, godless liberal fascists insecure about their cult and with myriad hang-ups with God treat evolution like a cult, not a theory.