Replies

"I pass judgment because Human Evolution is not a sound science that proves itself by using the scientific method."

Nothing in science depends on YOUR uneducated opinion.

If you have studied the subject for many years,
if you have done serious research work in the field,
if you've taught college level courses on the subject,
and if you have published PEER-REVIEWED articles in major scientific journals,
then and only then does your scientific opinion even begin to matter.

Otherwise, your opinion is just that -- an opinion.
It should have NO influence over what is or is not taught in science classes.

In summary: science is what scientists say it is, whether it happens to fit your religious agenda or not.

"Nothing in science depends on YOUR uneducated opinion.

If you have studied the subject for many years, if you have done serious research work in the field, if you've taught college level courses on the subject, and if you have published PEER-REVIEWED articles in major scientific journals, then and only then does your scientific opinion even begin to matter."

Yes, I have just an opinion, but so did those that approved the use of unproven, ancient material dating techniques and mystery fossils which have debatable accuracy at best and are horrifically wrong at worst. The peer reviewers who initially approved these techniques for use in science (I do not know their names) did have an educated opinion yes, but educated opinions are not what science is about. Science is about using an accurate method to prove a hypothesis, instead it has been transformed into a machine that is used to force a religious belief (Human Evolution) onto the masses using government bully tactics such as judges (who are not scientists either).

Edward John Smith, an expert in the Navy, a master of his field with medals, decades of experience, and a near unblemished and faultless record piloted the unsinkable Titanic to its grave. Experts are not perfect, never will be, and are capable of exceptionally stupid things in their own field of expertise.

Human Evolution is in itself an evolution of a lie that continues to grow bigger and bigger as it grows farther from its origins. It is based on the foundation of an itty bitty lie that is unproven and has not been successfully tested. The tiny lie is humans have achieved the ability to date matter in vast spans of time. This tiny lie is combined with the lie that we have found fossils of species that we evolved from. Together they attempt to form the gigantic lie of all lies which tries to overthrow God Himself and His word that He wrote in Genesis.

Scientists do not know for certain what these fossils are, nor can they be certain how old the fossils are. It is merely their educated (by mostly human evolutionists instructors), but unscientific, opinion that these fossils are thousands, hundreds of thousands, or billions of years old.

This will be my final post on the subject in this thread as I tire of this, and I will never convince the evolutionists here nor will they ever convince me. In my closing words I will say that many educated scientists' opinions are opinions that were formed by an education heavily biased towards Human Evolution. That my friends and fellow conservatives is a fact, a VERY important fact indeed.