Posted on 12/31/2008 4:33:55 PM PST by dascallie
On Friday, I guess we will see what the contents reveal ( the word is, it is stated within the language of the decree that the couple "have" one son of the union (Obama Jr), born in KENYA.)
If true, this will be a blockbuster revelation, recored on a legal document.
We will see.
-------------------------------------------------------------
IP: 98.206.74.240
Dec 31st, 2008 - 4:27 PM Re: URGENT: PLEASE BROADCAST THIS EVERYWHERE
Ed Hale has announced that the Divorce Decree of ObamaSr and Dunham will be posted on Friday, January 2nd. Tonight at 7:45 pm cst Ed will be on with Bobby and Mark to discuss more details.
TROLL
LOL I have never typed that before.
Anyway please don't discourage these threads, they are such a source of amusement for me.
barack was 19?
Is that supposed to be me, or you?
Wolf, as is cry it out loud.
X <-- that was ridiculous............... this is here X
That’s why he was not included. Only minor children on the divorce papers and Lolo was not Barry’s father.
but didn’t lolo adopt him?
Because it’s not true-more BS.
Yeah, 0bama’s presidency plus his lies, thugism, marxism, illegalities in every way - so hilarious - such a cause for light hearted merriment and fun! I am so happy it brings a smile to your lips and brings laughter to your heart!
Everything I’ve read shows that he did adopt him, but Barry was over 18 at the time these papers were filed/drawn up/filled out or whatever the right phrase is.
The stupid lawsuits claim he is not natural born...they acknowledge his birth in hawaii, but claim since his Father was not American and his Mother was too young...Obama is not natural born-total nonsense; some also claim MCain and Palin are not natural born citizen.
right. why would a divorce doc mention where a child was born? bizarre.
There's some that think he was adopted because it was necessary for him to attend school in Indonesia. Most divorce papers however only require a listing of minor children so if he was 19 then he would not be shown.
Just looked at my divorce papers and they only show childrens names, date of birth, and address. That was in California in 1984, other state requirements could be different.
It *could* be on it's way from Hawaii. Probably take a day longer than the idgits thought, and FedEX doesn't do Holidays.
Form over substance. Who cares how we are seen? I care about the truth, and the Constitution, small government except for a second to none military.
You'd not make much of an intelligence analyst, who use *all* available information, weighted by reliability of the source and confirmation from other sources. But never just thrown out, because it might make the analyst look foolish. Missing the key piece of information, now that really makes them look foolish, and may get a lot of people dead.
“Now why would anyone be stupid enough to announce this to the world before the document was in hand. You know that if this was true then the document will never reach its destination...etc.”
My very exact thoughts!!!
Very stupid indeed.
Sheesh...another “Lucy with the football” thread...
Unraveling.....
THURSDAY, JANUARY 1, 2009
Final Update, This Article:
Obama’s Kenyan Birth Evidence to be Revealed...
Permission to copy and post this article’s text is granted, I.O., AW.
Article originally posted, 12/31, 12:XX am CT
Update 1/1/2009, 3:36am CT - In his 7:45pm Plains Radio broadcast, this last night, Ed Hale backed down from his prior assertion of having gained even uncertain information about the Barack Sr. / Stanley Ann divorce decree containing language referring to Barack Jr. as being born in Kenya. Instead, Hale referred to an apparently tricky recollection... of an indeterminate person... referring to such a document’s generally referring to the place of birth of the children of the divorced parents. That is not what I heard from Mr. Hale on the 31st.
Two people reported during the broadcast that they had contacted Hale’s private investigator yesterday, who indicated he did not thoroughly read the documentation and does not know how it addresses Barack Obama Jr. — nor did he make a copy for himself. It would appear that Hale will receive a valid copy of this decree, probably Friday, 1/2. What it states will be what it states. He promises to post and report, as described below.
While my article maintains a journalistic separation from the principals of this story and is a report of statements of others on the matter, I believed it worthy of “pushing out” to readers and those who would faithfully relay the story. That worth appears less merited at this point and I apologize for that, to them and you. However, this should mean the first public viewing of that divorce decree. If it does not include information pertinent to Barack Obama’s birth, at least that will be known. And that is more than may be said of President Elect Obama’s actual birth certificate. This also seems fitting for a politco who advanced to the U.S. Senate along a path of the convenient “mainstream media” reporting of scandals from two of his opponents’ own divorce records and an “outing” of a family member of another; sauce for the goose.
I.O. emphasizes that place of birth aside, Barack Obama is clearly and thoroughly not a natural born Citizen and is therefore specifically ineligible to be our United States President. This is due to his U.K. citizenship at birth, passed from his father. That is referred to below and explained in the article, “The Donofrio ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Challenge.”
I.O. also observes that even a valid hard copy of the kind of certificate of birth that Obama has ostensibly submitted is not the kind of birth certificate which is required for numerous purposes. Further, it is suspect that Obama has invested what some say is approximately $1M to keep his actual, Hawaiian birth certificate undisclosed — seemingly thematic with “pleading the Fifth.” At the very least, it would officially document his father and that is one wheel off his bike to the White House.
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-kenyan-birth-evidence-to-be.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.