‘Go to hell, creationists!’ (Evo tolerance in action)

CMI ^ | December 30, 2008 | Carl Wieland

[GodGunsGuts]

Information scientist, author and evangelist, Dr Werner Gitt, a close friend of CMI, told us that on 23 October 2008 he was subjected to the most strident opposition he had ever encountered...

[DevNet]

I never claimed to be on her side as I am not sure what that side is.

[DevNet]

What did I misspell?

[DevNet]

Science generally welcomes those who can provide supporting evidence for their ideas. Do you have any evidence that this isn’t happening?

[Zionist Conspirator]

The Dolly Llama?

Yep. You expect me to correctly spell out the name of a false "gxd?"

You need sensitivity training to understand us quaint, beautiful minority groups. What are you, a chr*stian bigot? Shame on you!

[tacticalogic]

You expect me to correctly spell out the name of a false "gxd?"

Nah. Somebody dissed Christianity, so we should diss everbody else's religion in retaliation. It's the Christian thing to do.

[Sam's Army]

"I am not sure how I can be more clear"

Please justify this claim with evidence.

[DevNet]

What evidence would you be willing to accept?

[js1138]

There are now mountains of evidence supporting our contention that you are indeed a retread, formerly named dimensio.

I find it interesting that in posting this you pinged a Running Wolf retread.

And you accuse someone of being a retread of a FReeper who isn't even banned.

Did you reach your conclusions using the Explanatory Filter?

[Sam's Army]

Asserting that you are correct does not demonstrate that you are correct.

[tacticalogic]

What evidence would you be willing to accept?

You have been charged, and will be held guilty until proven innocent. Given the logical problems with proving a negative, I believe your conviction is a foregone conclusion.

[DevNet]

Your refusal to state what you would consider acceptable evidence makes it impossible for me to answer the question.

[DevNet]

Do I get to pick my last meal?

[Sam's Army]

"Your refusal to state what you would consider acceptable evidence makes it impossible for me to answer the question."

This is not a logical method of reasoning. You must provide positive evidence to support your claim in order for your claims to be credible.

[tacticalogic]

Do I get to pick my last meal?

Probably not.

[DevNet]

What sort of positive evidence are you willing to accept as valid?

[1000 silverlings]

My faith is not based on your belief system.

Amen, this is what the unspiritual just cannot comprehend .

[BibChr]

Yeah. Duh.

In similar breaking news, water is very, very wet.

[DevNet]

You know I am nonspiritual how?

[1000 silverlings]

Define “spiritual” in your worldview

[Sam's Army]

I am merely requesting clarification of your claim.