Replies

I’ve read some of the challenges to your research and they focus on attacking you personally and not on the data and obvious results and conclusions.

Specifically, they do not address the difference in the change in state seals or the border differences. They intentionally ignore all the inconsistencies.

Similiarily, has anyone defended the obvious inaccuracies and inconsistencies regarding the Selective Service Registration form from Deb. Schussel’s site?

It seems to have many of the same problems that you have identified with the bogus posted COLB.

It employed the wrong usage of the forms for the year issued, wrong usage of serial numbers and wrong usage of postal seal or stamp for the year processed.

Wrong, wrong, wrong = BOGUS-POTUS

You're right about the SS registration form having similar problems. I'm sure that if we had an entire paper-trail of Obama documents (the bulk of which have been lost or destroyed), they would either be outright forgeries or contain false information wherever historical data is requested - like his application to law school.

Bambi's run for the Presidency formerly began in 2004 with his DNC keynote address. From that point onwards, everything has been carefully orchestrated to make 2008 become 2012, the year pundits projected him to seek it.

But, I've been thinking about this thread and its implications. I'm almost tempted to write a companion post and call it, "It's the forgery, stupid!" because of something I said earlier. A natural-born US citizen would not create a forgery to prove that he is a natural-born US citizen.

The Obama team probably thought they had this in the bag when they tried to pass off this bogus COLB as his "original birth certificate." It would have been tough to forge and post a long-form birth certificate, but they thought that they did not have to make one since Hawaii does not make copies of them anymore.

Boy, was that a dumb move or what?