I looked up the full text of 3 USC 15, and I don't see that it has to be a Senator and Representative from the state of which the electoral tally is being challenged. Nor that the Senator and Representative need be from the same state as each other. Good Thing too, since it's going to be hard to find a non RINO Senator with the testicular fortitude to object. But I think there might be one or two that would be willing to give it a go. I hope.
I also hope they have some firm evidence, not just something collected on the internet, to back up their objection. Something the 'Rats cannot so easily dismiss. Like a Kenyan or UK birth certificate. Or even the one the state of Hawaii says they have.
Would a Senator or Representative have "standing" to obtain a court order for the BC?
“I don’t see that it has to be a Senator and Representative from the state of which the electoral tally is being challenged. “
You are correct. The alarms went off in my head and I tried to reach in and correct my statement via post #70.
Also agree with you on the firm evidence. Assuming O was not born in Hawaii, the draft on my About page suggests how I think they should go about it. They should not just weakly challenge and risk getting blown out or stalled beyond Jan 20 - unless they know the Hawaiian BC states Kenya for place of birth.
Rather, they should come loaded for bear with irrefutable evidence - and that evidence is in government files. O, his friends and O Sr., who allegedly was on a diplomatic passport, have not escaped the attention of LE and intel agencies over the years. The wrinkle is that O’s handlers have thought through each step and can be expected to employ any number of devices.
If the objection is defeated without the production of a BC, or despite such irrefutable evidence then I think there is a role for the USSC to determine whether the vote violates the Constitution.