Posted on 12/16/2008 3:39:05 AM PST by earmarksrus
That's why on November 9, while she was in New York on business, he offered her the job as senior advisor to the president and assistant to the president for intergovernmental affairs and public liaison. This position has her reporting directly to him and places her in the inner sanctum of the president of the United States, and ensures that her voice will be heard on nearly every issue.
I know the date well because on November 10, she confided in me that she had been offered the job, but I couldn't report anything until the announcement was about to be made. I had been working the phones to ascertain what jobs were being offered to a litany of Obama campaign officials, and she was certainly high on the list because of her relationship with Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at essence.typepad.com ...
On November 10th, it was publicly reported that Jarrett was going to be in the White House. And negotiations reflect the frustration on the part of the governor on November 10th recordings when he states he will put Senate Candidate 4 in.
However, there is no entry in the indictment on November 9th.... It is highly unlikely that there were no recorded conversations.
The question has to be asked why no November 9th? That is the point of when the decision was made to put Jarrett in the White House and it seems it was conveyed to the Governor by his frustration.
On November 12th, Harris notes that CNN has Jarrett wanting the White House position but, it seems negotiations are back on with possible involvement by the SEIU.
There is a clear break in the continuity in this indictment. For what reason, Fitzgerald needs to answer this.
Because it somehow involves Barack and we wouldn’t want anything to tarnish “The One”, now would we?
This indictment is starting to have a sanitized look to it when it comes to recordings......And it has parts that have speculation on who is being talked about.
Who is advisor B?
That is the only question that remains.
It’s one thing for the DBM to cover his ass, it’s a total other act for a Federal Prosecutor too!
The entire judiciary is covering the One’s 4ss - what’s a federal prosecutor or two on top of that?
Reminds me of the missing 10 minutes on the Nixon tapes...
The Governor stated the day before he was arrested that the wiretaps were like Nixon’s watergate.
Who was deep throat? (smile)
And I would think that the feds had someone working for them, prodding the Governor on.
If I had to choose which is the dirtier one in this affair, Blogojevich or Fitz, I would choose Fitz.
IMO Fitz is doing the DNC’s dirty work for them just as he did in the Plame affair.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.