On November 10th, it was publicly reported that Jarrett was going to be in the White House. And negotiations reflect the frustration on the part of the governor on November 10th recordings when he states he will put Senate Candidate 4 in.
However, there is no entry in the indictment on November 9th.... It is highly unlikely that there were no recorded conversations.
The question has to be asked why no November 9th? That is the point of when the decision was made to put Jarrett in the White House and it seems it was conveyed to the Governor by his frustration.
On November 12th, Harris notes that CNN has Jarrett wanting the White House position but, it seems negotiations are back on with possible involvement by the SEIU.
There is a clear break in the continuity in this indictment. For what reason, Fitzgerald needs to answer this.
Because it somehow involves Barack and we wouldn’t want anything to tarnish “The One”, now would we?
It’s one thing for the DBM to cover his ass, it’s a total other act for a Federal Prosecutor too!
Reminds me of the missing 10 minutes on the Nixon tapes...