Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire; papasmurf; STARWISE; ctdonath2
Starwise posted this. Has anybody bothered reading it besides ctdonath2 and I?

Is the Judicial Review Allowed Only After the Electoral College Vote?

Judge Alsup wrote, “Mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted, and the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify. Issues regarding qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress. Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review � if any � should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.” Timing is everything… you maybe the only one able to raise an “objection”

26 posted on 12/15/2008 9:16:15 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW

Re-reading it, I note it references the 20th Amendment, which answers the question “if O is disqualified, what then?” indicating the current answer is: Biden acts as President until either the House chooses someone, or March 4th arrives.


32 posted on 12/15/2008 9:27:39 AM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW

I wish I possessed the legal smarts to untangle
the meaning of that. Hope someone can explain
if there’s any validity to this as a possible
option.


34 posted on 12/15/2008 9:31:23 AM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW

I read it(not sure I undertand it all though).

Question: What ‘congressional processes’ must ‘run their course’ before the judiciary can weigh in?

That is where this issue sounds like it will die. The dems in control are not going to allow the congress to touch their messiah.

I am in a bit of a pessimist mood this morning, so forgive me. Our country has been taken over by a bunch of Chicago thugs and media marxists!


35 posted on 12/15/2008 9:33:17 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW

Yes, I read it. I posted it the other day. But, the last sentence isn’t true. The qualifications can, and should, be challenged before the Electors convene...in the States. The Constitution does not say it When a State fails in it’s duty to protect the citizens, then the SCOTUS MUST act.

Which they have failed to do. Now, we will have a crisis if 0bama is inaugurated without this matter being settled, and then, at some later date, it comes to light that he is unqualified.

If a sitting President is found to have been unqualified for office at time of election, then every action and decision that President has made or taken must be undone.

If he is found, after being sworn in, to be unqualified, that the Vice-President becoming the President isn’t automatic, that Congress can intervene and make an appointment. They can also vote to keep the illegal bastard in office, as well.

We’re screwed.


41 posted on 12/15/2008 9:50:00 AM PST by papasmurf (Impeach the illegal bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson