To: Soliton
There are millions, however, who need proof...Believing in the authenticity of the Shroud is not necessarily about "needing proof."
Making a fetish out of discrediting it is, however, psychologically revealing.
27 posted on
12/14/2008 7:00:17 PM PST by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: Petronski
"Making a fetish out of discrediting it is, however, psychologically revealing." My faith in Christ is by no means contingent on the authenticity of the shroud. My belief in the skeptics is contingent on their inability thus far to replicate it.
30 posted on
12/14/2008 7:16:21 PM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Petronski
"Making a fetish out of discrediting it is, however, psychologically revealing." My faith in Christ is by no means contingent on the authenticity of the shroud. My doubts in the assertions of the skeptics is contingent on their inability thus far to replicate it.
31 posted on
12/14/2008 7:16:25 PM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Petronski
I have found many atheists to be decent, intelligent people. I’ve never met an Anti-theist who was not a complete jerk.
35 posted on
12/14/2008 7:38:52 PM PST by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: Petronski
The Discovery channel presentation has deliberate lies in it.
36 posted on
12/14/2008 7:51:43 PM PST by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: Petronski
Making a fetish out of discrediting it is, however, psychologically revealing.I have done original research. Rogers was a fraud that leveraged his relationship with Thermochimica Acta to publish a feeble paper.
38 posted on
12/14/2008 8:00:09 PM PST by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson