I meant to add:
The key words in that conclusion were, “according to the will of their native government and of this government”.
Even if both of Obama’s parents had been Kenyan, their offspring would be a natural born American if born on American soil - unless a legal impediment (treaty or statute) was in place that satisfied both Kenyan and American interests at that time.
So, for Obama to be declared ineligible even if he was born in Hawaii, there would’ve had to be an existing and lawful impediment to him receiving “natural born” status, by mutual agreement between Kenya and the USA, and/or the UK and the USA, at the time of his birth.
We wouldn’t need Obama’s cooperation at all to find THAT smoking gun. Assuming it ever existed. Which, as far as I can tell, it didn’t.
His mother is a natural born American so it doesn’t matter if his natural father wasn’t. The fact she split with his alleged father is also totally irrelevant.
The argument over her age rendering Obama inelegible for natural born status is only relevant if Obama was not born in Hawaii.
So, we would need documentary evidence from Kenya (not mere testimony) proving that he was born there, and/or documentary evidence proving that the DoH in Hawaii lied on October 31st when they confirmed his place of birth was Honolulu, for there to be any question of ineligibility.
That's not what was said. They very carefully stated that they had an original BC on file. Foreign borns could get a Hawaiian BC if their parents lived in Hawaii for a year prior to birth.
For more information see: Obama's "birth certificate" - the Devil's in the details