And, it should be repeated once again, Hawaii law allowed the registration of a birth to a Hawaii resident who was not in the country at the time of the birth.
Yup!
§338-5 Compulsory registration of births. Within the time prescribed by the department of health, a certificate of every birth shall be substantially completed and filed with the local agent of the department in the district in which the birth occurred, by the administrator or designated representative of the birthing facility, or physician, or midwife, or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents.
[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
And it should be repeated a million times a day that the people who voted for this abomination _do not care_.
If it were proven beyond any shadow of doubt ~tomorrow~ that he was born in a mud hut in Mombasa to a woman who’d renounced her US citizenship and fathered by Satan himself, they will STILL worship him.
The laws of this land mean -nothing- to them.
They -only- want absolute power over us and they will continually seek ways to have it....”by any means necessary”.
“And, it should be repeated once again, Hawaii law allowed the registration of a birth to a Hawaii resident who was not in the country at the time of the birth.”
Yes, and for those who are using a birth announcement in a Hawaii newspaper (or two), I’d like them to post the policy of the paper(s) at the time, since I have not read it/them.
From experience, many papers would assign someone to go to hospitals for announcements (birth-death), much the same as they did/do for police reports, obituaries. It was how many started out.
It IS a Constitutional matter. A matter of our Countrys’ Law.
Ignore a little and before you know it, there is no law that won’t be ignored. Don’t like a law, ignore it. The end becomes justification for one’s actions, as long as one can rationalize it. (no intended association per ‘one’s/one’)
Common sense allows that this could have been remedied by producing access to birth records and relatives.
At this point, ‘truther’ types will find reason for the delay and use the time line for any number of ways to obfuscate what may be factual.
(I weigh in on non-eligibility due to many factors)
What is the problem in providing the document, access and scrutiny? Pride, superiority, retribution, arrogance... other?