[bergmeid]

Who is the plaintiff in this case and why did the Supreme Court of California deny it? I’m confused with all these lawsuits. Also, is there a case number so I can look it up in the SC of CA? Thanks.

[Red_Devil 232]

Lightfoot v. Bowen, docket number S168690. This is a “Petition for Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus for Stay”.

[Deepest End]

This is a new case that Dr. Taitz filed (I believe directly with the CA Supreme Court).

Supreme Court

Court data last updated: 12/06/2008 09:53 AM

Docket (Register of Actions)

LIGHTFOOT v. BOWEN

Case Number S168690

12/03/2008 Petition for mandate/prohibition & stay filed (civil) Petitioners Gail Lightfoot, etal ~Attorney Orly Taitz

12/03/2008 Received: Amended Proof of Service to Petition

12/05/2008 Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition & stay denied

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=569437&doc_no=S168690

I don't know a lot about the particulars of this case. I heard Dr. Orly discussing it the other day on PRN.

My understanding is that it was designed for the purpose of being denied at the CA SC level in order to rapidly be taken to SCOTUS.

I'll try to let you know more about the case as I find out.