Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe
Your red herrings stink.

Gov Palin didn't name a Supreme Court ruling she couldn't agree with apart from Roe, and so therefore she can't run for president?

Did anyone say she couldn't run? Please show me where.

NEWSFLASH for you... you don't appoint the POTUS. The POTUS is elected by electors who are selected by voters...and voters see this as a woman who can't even list a single newspaper or magazine she reads, or describe a single case with which she disagrees. She should study up so she can fire back with an eloquent shredding of Kelo v. City of New London or, heck, educate folks about Stenberg v. Carhart and tie it into Katie Couric's question and Sen. Obama's platform!

Regardless of whether you think our VP and potential President should be fluent American history and government, many voters do--and it makes her a less effective campaigner.

82 posted on 12/06/2008 3:38:38 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
Did anyone say she couldn't run? Please show me where”

Go to post # 6, and read. it says and I quote

“Sarah can’t compete in the big leagues without doing LOTS more homework—more than she has time to do between now and 2011, when the race starts.....Please tell your friends who are supporting her to quit!”

That was someone posting that she can't run, even in 2012 right there.

and voters see this as a woman who can't even list a single newspaper or magazine she reads, or describe a single case with which she disagrees”

What voters are you babbling about, dude?
Your Daily Kos voters pals?
Again, it's been proved over and over again, that Gov Palin reads plenty of magazines and newspapers. In one interview, it turns out she found out about the the decision of the McCain campaign to stop campaigning in Michigan, when she was reading the ew York Times that morning.
And again, not reading the stupid liberal media, and the even more stupd magazines like Time and Newsweek, is if anything a great reason to vote for someone. I cancalled my subscriptions to these brain dead publicans long ago, and have been a heck of a lot better informed since then.

84 posted on 12/06/2008 5:49:52 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Gondring
and voters see this as a woman who can't even list a single newspaper or magazine she reads”

Are these the same voters who are so energized by Gov Plain when she campaigned for Chambliss that they increased voter turn out for him, , leading to Chambliss winning by 14%, instead of the 5.3% that RCP said he was going to win by? Don't confuse voters with Daily Kos vermin and the lame brian media.

*********** Chambliss: ‘Dynamite’ Palin Turned Out the Vote (take note GOP leadership)
““Sarah Palin came in on the last day, did a fly-around and, man, she was dynamite,” Chambliss told Fox News on Wednesday. “We packed the houses everywhere we went. And it really did allow us to peak and get our base fired up.”
...........
“I can’t overstate the impact she had down here. All these folks did a great job coming in,” he said, referring to former presidential candidates Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani. “They allow you [to] add momentum to where we were in the campaign. But when she walks in a room, folks just explode.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2142802/posts

85 posted on 12/06/2008 5:58:09 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Gondring
Regardless of whether you think our VP and potential President should be fluent American history and government, many voters do”

Voters vote for people that know American history?
Surely you mean Kenyan history. Americans just elected a guy that was probably not even born in this country, a guy who knows so little about American history, he claimed his grandfather ..wait for it.., liberated the Jews at Auschwitz, for crying out loud. Anyone who has even a modicum of knowledge about American history, knows that US troops never liberated anyone at Auschwitz, because US troops were not even in Poland during WWII at all.

But here we have a guy, Obama, who is so clueless about US history, that he lyingly boasted that his grandfather “liberated” Auschwitz, only to be elected as US president. And you think voters vote for guys with a good knowledge of American history? Never heard any voter say that anywhere during these elections.

You are getting pretty desperate in your increasingly pathetic attempts to smear Gov Palin..and it's not working.

86 posted on 12/06/2008 6:15:10 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson