[BonRad]

ping

[IrishPennant]

Thanks for the ping BonRad

[LucyT]

Thank you, BonRad.

Ping.

It is not about the birth certificate … it is about citizenship and who is eligible to hold the office of President of the United States right now, in 2008.

It is not about race, affirmative action, or the ‘popular vote’. It is about the rule of law, a nation of laws, and our Constitution.

It is about the rule of law, a nation of laws, and our Constitution.

[Fred Nerks]

...The signs of Obama’s deceit have been plainly out in the open: his claim to be a citizen under the 14th Amendment; his admission that he was born of dual citizenship; the sealing of all of his records and refusal to release his long-form certificate of live birth, and his endless autobiographies about his Kenyan father; his travels to Pakistan; and his adoption in Indonesia. While our lack of knowledge does not absolve Obama, the DNC, the RNC and Congress from doing their job in verifying his eligibility, the lack of awareness on the part of the American public, the media narrative, the money, and Obama’s seeming collusion with Congress has left us in a very uncomfortable position now—facing the dissolution of our Union.

All very sobering. I am reading Mein Kampf again. The footnotes, written in hindsight by an historian show frightening similarities. Hitler glossed over his background, played the victim to cover his very obvious shortcomings, lied about when his mother died, maligned his father, was a total failure at school and was asked to leave, described himself as a talented artist - whilst living in state accommodation for the homeless...avoided registering for military service by constantly moving across the border...

...and I'm only up to page 28!

[penelopesire]

MUST READ PING!! Thanks for the ping BR!

[Kevmo]

Thanks for the ping.

Before I begin this essay, I want to speak to ... those who are simply anguished, and who ... doubt that, or would be surprised if, the Supreme Court will do anything on this issue. Many are thinking the Court will want to avoid civil unrest and believe that it will succumb to “public pressure”, the standing issue, the ‘popular vote’, or the ‘procedural errors’, and dismiss the cases outright.
***I admit I’m one of those who have less hope than this good Doctor.

Many people have forgotten that the Supreme Court has historically and knowingly taken on controversial issues despite the perceived threat or reality of civil unrest.
***It’s not that I’ve forgotten. It’s that I’ve noticed the Supremes having plenty of courage when it came to liberal issues, but we see them splitting the baby when it comes to conservative issues. For instance, the Kelo decision, and the invention of a right to kill unborn babies.