There you go again, waving around an unverifiable resume, throwing insults and asking red herring questions. Lots of fallacies, no logic.
Here’s the logic:
The tax code changes annually.
Those tax code changes generally get finalized in the summer, July to September range.
Those tax code changes go into effect Jan 1.
If you can’t get tax code changes into your payroll software in under a year, as you state, then you can’t have payroll software that actually works.
Mid year changes have happened twice in the last 20 years (a withholding change by Bush41 and a full tax change by Bush43 both with about 3 months notice), so even if this change was somehow “bigger” than the normal annual change it’s still a demonstrated FACT that these changes HAVE BEEN (and therefore CAN) be implemented in months not years.
That’s the basic reality, your 1, 2 maybe 5 years claim flies in the face of the annual changes every payroll software has had to deal with since the first one got written. These kind of changes ARE implemented quickly EVERY SINGLE YEAR by EVERY PAYROLL SYSTEM in the nation. Wave your fallacies around all you want but the FACTS show your original statement is BS.
I am waiting for an answer to my simple question to prove your quals.
I do this for a living. You don't.
People can believe you, a tester (the lowest of the low on the IT ladder BTW), or me, a developer and implementer with more years experience than you have years on the planet.
This proposal can't be implemented quickly. Those of us who know things understand this.
If you can't answer my simple question then you don't do ERPs. For real companies, anyway.
i plead ingnorance in HR/Payroll..despite at least a decade overseeing payrools for hundreds at times...but can’t taxes owed be determined through multiplication and without division, thus avoiding the “div/0” problem?