Posted on 12/01/2008 10:48:17 PM PST by BonRad
For your ping lists
Sorry deepest end, as it was your thread there. I got ref from STARWISE. Anyways thanks to both of you.
Ping.
Welcome to FR. To give a courtesy ping to someone, you need to put their name into the “To” field. Otherwise, they may never see your post.
Here’s a working link to DeepestEnd’s thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2141126/posts
;)
That’s the show I heard,,,
Neither Rush or the rest of national talk radio will
touch this,,,but,,,
Moon Griffon has been all over it for nearly a week,,,
I see that O’Bammy didn’t show up with his BC today,,,
He must be Speeeeshull!!!...
: )
It’s so good to see FR manners instilled in n00bs.
Thank you.
I don’t know when I’m ever going to catch up.
In this case, I don’t think it was a matter of manners. He seemed to want to ping the FReepers he was talking to, but hadn’t yet figured out how. It’s refreshing to see a n00b who has manners, and tries to play by the rules here.
Oh, and as far as catching up, good luck with that. I don’t expect to ever catch up. I’m just hoping to pick up enough scraps to have a clue what’s going on. Darn 3D world keeps interfering with my FReeptime.
Thanx, will listen...
but I’m really thinking the Titular Head of American Conservatism is NOT disparaging....
for what its worth. Was that one little entry that heavy Friday after he’d a week before, been more dismissive calling it a Dem problem.
Remember too Rush went at the Vince Foster case while most sat on their hands.
Davis is far more cynical than Rush. The screeners must have have wanted to approach the subject...
All you need is four Justices to agree to take the case.
Roberts
Alito
Scalia
Thomas
I trust that the Four Good Conservative Justices will do what is correct but I am not sure many here will be happy about their decision.
http://www.anusha.com/anthrax.htm
I was shocked to be told that my petitions and all other petitions had been taken off site to be inspected for Anthrax and that they will not be brought back to the court to be docketed for two or three more days.
Two or Three days!!! I am trying to get action before the election tomorrow. My petitions cannot wait two or three days.
I am enraged. If I had known this, I would have taken the train to Washington DC and delivered my petitions for certiorari personally. Then, there would have been no delay for Anthrax inspection.
Why is there a two or three day delay for Anthrax inspection anyway? Why can�ft they just open the package, check it for Anthrax and deliver it back to the court an hour or two later?
Is Anthrax really such a problem that all court cases have to be slowed down because of this?
I demand a Congressional investigation of this.
Sam Sloan
November 1, 2004
Because the Supreme Court justices do NOT accept faxes, e-mails or telephone calls,
there is only one way to make your voice heard in time for Friday's preliminary hearing – overnight delivery of your letter.
To make that process simpler, more convenient and less expensive, WND has devised a plan to get a concise letter on the subject, over your name, delivered to all nine justices by FedEx for the price of just $9.95. This offer ends Thursday at noon Eastern time to ensure all letters are delivered by Friday morning to the Supreme Court.
Example:
Dear Associate Justice ______:
If the Constitution doesn't mean precisely what it says, then America is no longer a nation under the rule of law.
A nation no longer under the rule of law is, by definition, under the rule of men.
Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution clearly stipulates "No person except a natural born Citizen" shall be eligible to serve as president of the United States. That statement has clear meaning, and the Supreme Court of the United States is one of the controlling legal authorities in ensuring that the Constitution is enforced – even if doing so may prove awkward.
With the Electoral College set to make its determination Dec. 15 that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. be the next president of the United States, the Supreme Court is holding a conference Friday to review a case challenging his eligibility for the office based on Article 2, Section 1.
I urge you to take this matter most seriously – and judge it only on the clear, unambiguous words of the Constitution: A president must, at the very least, be a "natural born citizen" of the United States.
If you agree that this clear constitutional requirement still matters, the Supreme Court must use its authority to establish, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. qualifies for the office under that standard.
There is grave, widespread and rapidly growing concern throughout the American public that this constitutional requirement is being overlooked and enforcement neglected by state and federal election authorities. It's up to the Supreme Court to dispel all doubt that America's next president is truly a natural born citizen of the United States.
I urge you to honor the Constitution in this matter and uphold the public trust.
Sincerely,
Your name
Your address
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82449
Thank you.
Obama isn’t taking unscreened questions in his press conferences. He is likely scared to death that someone will ask him to show his birth certificate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.