Posted on 12/01/2008 10:48:17 PM PST by BonRad
I just listened to the plainsradio Dec 1 broadcast! Thanx STARWISE for the bigtime tip http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2141126/posts Leo Donofrio & Cort Wrotnowski on Plains Radio Network Now - 6PM CST and the below poster:
To: All Leo Donofrio is back on Plains Radio Network now live: http://www.plainsradio.com/chat.html 125 posted on Monday, December 01, 2008 11:02:24 PM by Deepest End ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government." - Thomas Paine)
What I heard ended just before midnight EST here – straight off the listen live button so I take it this was 1st or 2nd replay . I scrolled quickly though the comments. Posts creep over into Dec 2 here and see no new threads. This needs a new one IMHO. I am not speaking out of turn. I have the time here and think this must be posted clearly. Its taken me almost 90 minutes to compose this and no one, it seems as I check, is covering this on very latest thread(s).
I came into the broadcast as Donofrio was citing the emphasis on BOII’s dual citizenship AT BIRTH given papaBO was, as Kenya, a Brit. He and Thunder got into it pretty good on what be the case if papaBO wasn’t the papa. Donofrion insisted the case remains as BOII hasn’t offered (effectively-not quoting) an alternative, has been holding as he has from birth thru election, so it can’t effect case ( I think this was his thrust- the specific unsupplemented case- it got quite heated here). Thunder (somewhat?) relented and said he was testing LD as “contrarian” in prep for what may be coming.
IT SEEMS CORT’S REBUFF DUE TO THIS SEND-OFF OF HIS FEDEX TO ANTHRAX LAB HAS GOTTEN DONOFRIO, HALE AND THUNDER ON THE SAME PAGE- THAT AS MANY AS POSSIBLE (probably at this point-they’re sleeping on it) SHOULD GET TO DC THIS WEEK TO PROTEST ACTIONS OF THE CLERKS- SPECFICIALLY KEEP PROTEST TO THE MATTERS OF THE CLERKS. HALE AND THUNDER SAID THERE THAT THEY COULD GET THOUSANDS!! Donofrio emphasized it MUST be about McCain’s ineligibility as well as BO (inferring this cannot be a “remove Obama” protest).
THESE TWO TEXANS HALE AND THUNDER (and as Thunder says he’s got Indian blood in him too!) said they were able to get a thousand or so to the LA Times in 36 hr notice. I take it this was the protest just before the election on the non-release of the video tape of BHO dinner toasting Khalidi. The four will be talking Tues Dec 2 AM on appropriateness and timing of A PUBLIC PROTEST IN FRONT OF THE US SUPREME COURT.
It sounded like, from a Donofrio weak speculation that was really a suggestion, THURSDAY DEC 4 would be something to talk about.
Thunder said in there to Leo that Thunder has made many, many, MANY “new friends” on this and that Leo “would be VERY surprised at some who” were supportive of the matter!! Hale said that many were “CHOMPING AT THE BIT” to do something and this could be it.
After the others were off, Hale made a simple but rousing call to the listeners to book flights and get there. He didn’t fail to say as he was signing off it’ll be: “Goodbye Obama”.
I only wish I could go and meet some of these and you fine people. I simply can’t go. What patriots these people are! God Help them and protect them in this most noble cause. May this come about, dear Lord, and may it transpire as You Will, through the intercession of The Blessed Virgin Mary under the title of Immaculate Conception, so especially given as protectoress of our nation, which deserves nothing given what has taken place.
ON ANOTHER NOTE- Didn’t anyone hear the RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW TODAY Dec 1 Monday? Substitute anchor Marc Davis let in a couple callers toward end. MD called it at outset with each caller (with a pregnant cynical sigh): “that pesky birth certificate” thing. You can bet there are many calls in on this the screeners just deal with as they do. Rush got NUMEROUS emails on it the week before the “election” and said so the Friday before it.
First caller did a very good job. Bob the Drafter paced himself well and said bit and got MD’s serious-enough attention, though it was finally a “this isn’t going anywhere” conclusion by MD twice, and especially at end. Bob actually mentioned he had spoken by phone to Andy Martin. I can’t recall all of Bob’s main points but he was on probably 3-5 minutes. He cited Berg and Donofrio definitely and I think a NY case and maybe Keyes. Just can’t recall, I was driving. I think Bob got in a complaint about cancelled efforts (like Berg, Martin) over improper “standing”. Bob was able to get MD to concede it all could be true but MD’s responses were very deft study in ignorance of case. MD was had a very odd kind of fence-sitting poise with feet firmly on the “no way” side. He did say either to this caller or next- well then you’d have President Joe Biden! MD seemed to be taking the stance that once Bam Bam was in that was about it. Don’t quote me but he did wax and wane a bit about such lack of precedence so as to be a murky swamp that would be a long lawyer’s feast.
Another caller came in, a young fellow on something-or-other (sorry I was in a bit of shock). Then he did field another call with a very few minutes left from a middle aged woman. I can’t recall her thrust or opening. This was a very short call, no more than 2 minutes and ended the show here Monday Dec 1.
He did cite to second caller the 20th Amendment Sec 3 “then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified”, though MD didn’t quite get 1st part of this correct (he left out at least “elect”), he was AS YOU MIGHT EXPECT VERSED ENOUGH TO CITE WHAT HE DID.
This caught the woman off guard! She did an audible “ooohhh” and said something to effect: oh, I hadn’t got to that! Neither he nor she were able to cite back the very next logical thing which was 12th Amendment and relation between a stymied Electoral College triggering throwing election to the House of Representatives into March 4! AMAZING! If the woman got this far how did she miss this?
MD said like a confident school principal looking down and giving a friendly shove(again not exact) this just wasn’t going anywhere, save all the keystrokes and go read a good book in a nice place.
Take what you will but I’ve tried to say before on this board Rush is NOT disparaging of the matter (so he sounded that final pre-election Friday at the outset of the show) and I don’t know Davis from a hole in the wall (though I’ve heard him sub before).
For your ping lists
Sorry deepest end, as it was your thread there. I got ref from STARWISE. Anyways thanks to both of you.
Ping.
Welcome to FR. To give a courtesy ping to someone, you need to put their name into the “To” field. Otherwise, they may never see your post.
Here’s a working link to DeepestEnd’s thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2141126/posts
;)
That’s the show I heard,,,
Neither Rush or the rest of national talk radio will
touch this,,,but,,,
Moon Griffon has been all over it for nearly a week,,,
I see that O’Bammy didn’t show up with his BC today,,,
He must be Speeeeshull!!!...
: )
It’s so good to see FR manners instilled in n00bs.
Thank you.
I don’t know when I’m ever going to catch up.
In this case, I don’t think it was a matter of manners. He seemed to want to ping the FReepers he was talking to, but hadn’t yet figured out how. It’s refreshing to see a n00b who has manners, and tries to play by the rules here.
Oh, and as far as catching up, good luck with that. I don’t expect to ever catch up. I’m just hoping to pick up enough scraps to have a clue what’s going on. Darn 3D world keeps interfering with my FReeptime.
Thanx, will listen...
but I’m really thinking the Titular Head of American Conservatism is NOT disparaging....
for what its worth. Was that one little entry that heavy Friday after he’d a week before, been more dismissive calling it a Dem problem.
Remember too Rush went at the Vince Foster case while most sat on their hands.
Davis is far more cynical than Rush. The screeners must have have wanted to approach the subject...
All you need is four Justices to agree to take the case.
Roberts
Alito
Scalia
Thomas
I trust that the Four Good Conservative Justices will do what is correct but I am not sure many here will be happy about their decision.
http://www.anusha.com/anthrax.htm
I was shocked to be told that my petitions and all other petitions had been taken off site to be inspected for Anthrax and that they will not be brought back to the court to be docketed for two or three more days.
Two or Three days!!! I am trying to get action before the election tomorrow. My petitions cannot wait two or three days.
I am enraged. If I had known this, I would have taken the train to Washington DC and delivered my petitions for certiorari personally. Then, there would have been no delay for Anthrax inspection.
Why is there a two or three day delay for Anthrax inspection anyway? Why can�ft they just open the package, check it for Anthrax and deliver it back to the court an hour or two later?
Is Anthrax really such a problem that all court cases have to be slowed down because of this?
I demand a Congressional investigation of this.
Sam Sloan
November 1, 2004
Because the Supreme Court justices do NOT accept faxes, e-mails or telephone calls,
there is only one way to make your voice heard in time for Friday's preliminary hearing – overnight delivery of your letter.
To make that process simpler, more convenient and less expensive, WND has devised a plan to get a concise letter on the subject, over your name, delivered to all nine justices by FedEx for the price of just $9.95. This offer ends Thursday at noon Eastern time to ensure all letters are delivered by Friday morning to the Supreme Court.
Example:
Dear Associate Justice ______:
If the Constitution doesn't mean precisely what it says, then America is no longer a nation under the rule of law.
A nation no longer under the rule of law is, by definition, under the rule of men.
Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution clearly stipulates "No person except a natural born Citizen" shall be eligible to serve as president of the United States. That statement has clear meaning, and the Supreme Court of the United States is one of the controlling legal authorities in ensuring that the Constitution is enforced – even if doing so may prove awkward.
With the Electoral College set to make its determination Dec. 15 that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. be the next president of the United States, the Supreme Court is holding a conference Friday to review a case challenging his eligibility for the office based on Article 2, Section 1.
I urge you to take this matter most seriously – and judge it only on the clear, unambiguous words of the Constitution: A president must, at the very least, be a "natural born citizen" of the United States.
If you agree that this clear constitutional requirement still matters, the Supreme Court must use its authority to establish, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. qualifies for the office under that standard.
There is grave, widespread and rapidly growing concern throughout the American public that this constitutional requirement is being overlooked and enforcement neglected by state and federal election authorities. It's up to the Supreme Court to dispel all doubt that America's next president is truly a natural born citizen of the United States.
I urge you to honor the Constitution in this matter and uphold the public trust.
Sincerely,
Your name
Your address
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82449
Thank you.
Obama isn’t taking unscreened questions in his press conferences. He is likely scared to death that someone will ask him to show his birth certificate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.